Forum: Small Stakes
09-04-2007, 02:57 PM
|
Replies: 3
Views: 34
A ramble and a digest of sorts from uNL
I found this post by Munkey very helpful (http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showflat.php?Cat=0&Number=7843750&page=0&fpart=1&vc=1&nt=2)
I'm in the midst of taking a shot at NL100 myself and have...
|
Forum: Small Stakes
08-28-2007, 04:00 AM
|
Replies: 4
Views: 39
|
Forum: Omaha High
04-30-2007, 02:45 AM
|
Replies: 13
Views: 108
Re: I don\'t get it
Um, so far as I know, Stars only lets you buy in for 100 bbs. So that would make all relevant stacks in this hand . . . decidedly not half buy-ins.
|
Forum: Omaha High
04-28-2007, 01:20 PM
|
Replies: 14
Views: 95
Whoops.
Ah, it's a wrap. Sorry, I read it as an OESD. Thanks for the correction. Shove. (By implied odds, I meant the pot odds after villain calls all-in. Is that an incorrect use of the term?)
But...
|
Forum: Omaha High
04-28-2007, 01:09 PM
|
Replies: 14
Views: 95
|
Forum: Omaha High
04-28-2007, 01:07 PM
|
Replies: 14
Views: 95
|
Forum: Omaha High
04-28-2007, 12:24 PM
|
Replies: 14
Views: 95
|
Forum: Omaha High
04-28-2007, 12:00 PM
|
Replies: 9
Views: 221
Re: AA preflop Raiser, Hero?
See my post above. On a call, you have at most 1.4:1 implied odds and are a 2.2:1 dog. On a shove, you have zero implied odds because you have NOTHING behind and therefore nothing more to win.
|
Forum: Omaha High
04-28-2007, 09:29 AM
|
Replies: 9
Views: 221
Re: AA preflop Raiser, Hero?
This is an easy fold made moreso by the fact that you are shortstacked. You have 8 outs and practically nothing behind, so you are getting, what, 1.4:1 max implied odds on your 2.2:1 dog. Dump it....
|
Forum: Omaha High
04-28-2007, 09:13 AM
|
Replies: 19
Views: 94
Re: An interesting situation I encountered today
A few other factors to consider..
Taking the example of 777x on a 799 board vs TTTx on a TQQ board:
1) Fewer overcards can come to the Ts than the 7s, so fewer boats can be made that are higher...
|
Forum: Micro Stakes
04-26-2007, 11:58 AM
|
Replies: 35
Views: 162
Re: $25: Low PP vs active opponent
I was iffy about calling the turn, and I like this analysis to explain my gut feeling a bit. /images/graemlins/smile.gif I really don't think the implied odds support a turn call given that when you...
|
Forum: Omaha High
04-26-2007, 03:58 AM
|
Replies: 5
Views: 57
|
Forum: Micro Stakes
04-25-2007, 06:18 PM
|
Replies: 6
Views: 39
Re: NL 25 - Tough river spot
He beats you w/TT or AKd/AJd. Can't see him raising anything else UTG. Can't really see him with TT, either, given no 3-bet on the flop or turn. And I can't see him betting the flop with KJ. I...
|
Forum: Micro Stakes
04-25-2007, 05:42 PM
|
Replies: 3
Views: 37
|
Forum: Micro Stakes
04-25-2007, 04:23 PM
|
Replies: 17
Views: 81
Re: TPTK + NutFD call flop easiest push ever?
I don't think it's quite a push here, as the stacks are still pretty deep. Given the still smallish nature of the pot and without a read, I think there's a good chance you're not getting called by...
|
Forum: Micro Stakes
04-25-2007, 04:11 PM
|
Replies: 16
Views: 70
Re: probably standard..
How is a raise to $8 into a $4 pot, as two posters have suggested, profitable? If you're done if you get called or raised, you'd have to induce a fold 2/3 of the time to break even, no? Do we...
|
Forum: Micro Stakes Limit
04-24-2007, 10:20 AM
|
Replies: 18
Views: 113
Re: I thought pocket pairs were easy to play
I want to point out something that no one else seems to be commenting on. You say that you spent your effort in this hand trying to protect your hand, but in fact you never succeeded in doing so. ...
|
Forum: Micro Stakes Limit
04-21-2007, 08:52 PM
|
Replies: 14
Views: 105
Re: plz comment hands
[ QUOTE ]
should I have guessed the man had trips because of his raise and not pay him of?
[/ QUOTE ]
I believe you meant, because of his river donk bet, not because of his raise. In...
|
Forum: Micro Stakes Limit
04-21-2007, 01:22 PM
|
Replies: 20
Views: 132
Re: Count my mistakes please
PF is fine.
Flop is an easy raise. You have the nut flush draw against 4 players. The only hand you are worried about given the action is KK from the UTG+1, but he could have been 3-betting AA,...
|