![]() |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ah, it's a wrap. Sorry, I read it as an OESD. Thanks for the correction. Shove. (By implied odds, I meant the pot odds after villain calls all-in. Is that an incorrect use of the term?)
But with 15 outs (the wrap adds four more) and still having to dodge the board pairing, 55% equity is still high. I'd buy 45%, maybe lower. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Even if it was just an OESD I would be shoving.
Implied odds refers to the amount of money you could potentially win if you hit your card, regardless of current pot odds. This is a function of stack size. Stack size is the crucial factor for why I'm shoving this 100% and not even thinking about it. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
With K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]x this is still an easy call and the Manc is completely right on all fronts
Wow bet thats the first time someone's said that |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
With K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]x this is still an easy call and the Manc is completely right on all fronts Wow bet thats the first time someone's said that [/ QUOTE ] Yup, probably coz i'm not a manc, i'm a londoner. [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img] |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
With K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]x this is still an easy call and the Londoner is completely right on all fronts Wow bet thats the first time someone's said that [/ QUOTE ] FMP |
![]() |
|
|