Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-23-2007, 10:39 PM
paperjam paperjam is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: a 300 mile drive from anything interesting
Posts: 1,643
Default **Official 2007 Kansas City Royals World Series Thread**

they must have some fans somewhere.......speak out!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-23-2007, 10:41 PM
Your Mom Your Mom is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Council Bluffs Horseshoe Casino
Posts: 4,274
Default Re: **Official 2007 Kansas City Royals World Series Thread**

they're my second fav team. god, their bullpen sucks.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-23-2007, 10:43 PM
Suigin406 Suigin406 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: fire isiah and minaya
Posts: 8,613
Default Re: **Official 2007 Kansas City Royals World Series Thread**

not a fan, but seriously, how do u resist not going batsh** crazy over management and that owner??
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-23-2007, 10:45 PM
paperjam paperjam is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: a 300 mile drive from anything interesting
Posts: 1,643
Default Re: **Official 2007 Kansas City Royals World Series Thread**

given the current state of MLB and the difficulty of their division, do they have ANY chance of having a winning season? if so, what are the chances?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-23-2007, 11:18 PM
Your Mom Your Mom is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Council Bluffs Horseshoe Casino
Posts: 4,274
Default Re: **Official 2007 Kansas City Royals World Series Thread**

[ QUOTE ]
given the current state of MLB and the difficulty of their division, do they have ANY chance of having a winning season? if so, what are the chances?

[/ QUOTE ]

if they had a decent bullpen, they'd have a shot at .500. Their lineup is pretty decent, esp. is Gordon ever gets going. Rotation isn't terrible. Meche has looked very good. I really like De La Rosa. If Hochevar comes through like he should, then they won't have a bad rotation the next few years. Greinke should be okay too, as long as he doesn't fly off the deep end again.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-23-2007, 11:19 PM
Your Mom Your Mom is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Council Bluffs Horseshoe Casino
Posts: 4,274
Default Re: **Official 2007 Kansas City Royals World Series Thread**

[ QUOTE ]
not a fan, but seriously, how do u resist not going batsh** crazy over management and that owner??

[/ QUOTE ]

new management (GM) is helping. They spent some money and at least have a plan.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-24-2007, 01:00 AM
paperjam paperjam is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: a 300 mile drive from anything interesting
Posts: 1,643
Default Re: **Official 2007 Kansas City Royals World Series Thread**

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
not a fan, but seriously, how do u resist not going batsh** crazy over management and that owner??

[/ QUOTE ]

new management (GM) is helping. They spent some money and at least have a plan.

[/ QUOTE ]

i don't keep up on this, but i know in the past they've spent a lot of the money MLB has given them (from the likes of the Yankees) not on players...is that changing?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-24-2007, 06:13 AM
xJames2112 xJames2112 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Bible Belt
Posts: 218
Default Re: **Official 2007 Kansas City Royals World Series Thread**

[ QUOTE ]
given the current state of MLB and the difficulty of their division, do they have ANY chance of having a winning season? if so, what are the chances?

[/ QUOTE ]

Three years ago the AL Central was the worst division in baseball. A lot can change in two or three years.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-24-2007, 06:39 AM
xJames2112 xJames2112 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Bible Belt
Posts: 218
Default Re: **Official 2007 Kansas City Royals World Series Thread**

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
not a fan, but seriously, how do u resist not going batsh** crazy over management and that owner??

[/ QUOTE ]

new management (GM) is helping. They spent some money and at least have a plan.

[/ QUOTE ]

i don't keep up on this, but i know in the past they've spent a lot of the money MLB has given them (from the likes of the Yankees) not on players...is that changing?

[/ QUOTE ]

The whole structure of the way the Royals I think is changing. The singing of Gil Meche proved that I think. The biggest thing that has happened in the last year, besides the hiring of Dayton Moore as GM, is that the owner and his son are staying out of making baseball decisions and not handcuffing the GM. I can defiantly see a future for this team, it's just going to take a while to develop. This isn't the NFL where you can fix a team overnight. The Royals dug themselves in such a deep hole that it might take years for this team to recover, but we'll see what happens. I can already see a big difference in the starting pitching. Hopefully the bullpen will stabilize once Dotel gets healthy.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-24-2007, 01:07 PM
midwestkc midwestkc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 521
Default Re: **Official 2007 Kansas City Royals World Series Thread**

I personally think that Dotel is all but done. I'm a big Royals fan, and I think they'd be all right if the bullpen was decent. They have a workable rotation, and they'll score some runs. However, they are trying to build their system, making a lot of trades that might not do anything now (or may hurt in the case of, say, the McDougal trade - I don't recall exactly what they got for him, but it was minor league pitchers, if I recall), but should help out in 2-3 years. I still think that they have a shot at only losing 95 games (which is bad, but a big improvement), and that that will signify a lot better team than only a 5 game improvement may generally signify given the strength of their division.

That said, they have some relief coming in the way of players recovering from injuries that should help. Elarton, Hudson, and Nelson are all better than what they've got in the bullpen. I'd also look for at least Elarton, if not Hudson, too, to join the rotation. This should allow guys like Bannister, and hopefully Perez to strengthen the bullpen.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.