|
|
#11
01-04-2006, 01:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ed Miller Please Show us the Way - a proposal
I agree w/ Buccaneer. I'd spend some decent coin to get a book written my Mr. Miller that specifically addresses the internet games and limits that I play. I hope he, or another qualified person, decides to undertake this quest, as I need all the help I can get!
|
|
#12
01-04-2006, 02:29 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ed Miller Please Show us the Way - a proposal
[ QUOTE ]
FWIW: 1. I've been playing $1-$2 and $3-$6 on Party. I don't have a lot of money online, and I don't really want to add more. So I'm just going to "play my bankroll up" as it were. [/ QUOTE ] If I may ask, out of curiosity, is there a reason you don't play at the $2/4 tables? Do you play mostly 6 max? I've noticed they don't have any 6 max tables at $2/4, which I find odd.
|
|
#13
01-04-2006, 02:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ed Miller Please Show us the Way - a proposal
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] FWIW: 1. I've been playing $1-$2 and $3-$6 on Party. I don't have a lot of money online, and I don't really want to add more. So I'm just going to "play my bankroll up" as it were. [/ QUOTE ] If I may ask, out of curiosity, is there a reason you don't play at the $2/4 tables? Do you play mostly 6 max? I've noticed they don't have any 6 max tables at $2/4, which I find odd. [/ QUOTE ] I've been playing 6-max, yes. And I don't know why they don't have $2-$4 6-max.
|
|
#14
01-04-2006, 03:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ed Miller Please Show us the Way - a proposal
[ QUOTE ]
I've been playing 6-max, yes. And I don't know why they don't have $2-$4 6-max. [/ QUOTE ] Party doesn't, but many other sites do Ed. Try Stars, Prima, etc. Eurobet has 5-max 2/4 - yummy except the rake is brutal at that network for low limit short handed. TT [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]
|
|
#15
01-04-2006, 11:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ed Miller Please Show us the Way - a proposal
[ QUOTE ]
(if I do write more poker books, which I'm not sure I will) [/ QUOTE ] I'm going to pretend I didn't read this and I hope that you will pretend that you didn't write it.
|
|
#16
01-05-2006, 02:51 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
No 2-4 6-max because . . .
Just a theory but -
The rake is far bigger at 3-6 [6-max] than 2-4 [6-max]. - By "bigger" I am referring to more $40+ pots and fewer unraked pots. They must offer 1-2/m-6 to allow people to moisten their feet; there is no compelling reason to offer 2-4/m-6 but there is a good one (from their perspective) not to. * For those who disagree, see above: "just a theory".
|
|
#17
01-05-2006, 08:47 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: No 2-4 6-max because . . .
[ QUOTE ]
For those who disagree, see above: "just a theory". [/ QUOTE ] Glad its a theory, because its not correct. You can get rake comparison charts here at 2+2 (often found in the Zoo), or you can also get a simplified version at each online poker room. TT [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
