|
|
#11
10-16-2007, 03:19 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: KJo vs tighty
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] i edited my post to make it much longer and hopefully a little more useful. i forgot to consider that he can have KJ though. the only thing this changes is that you cannot b/f now. then it becomes a clear c/c, as my ev calc shows. depending on assumptions it's either clearly better than b/c or has the same ev. [/ QUOTE ] Good analysis. I know if I was villain on that river with AA or KK, I would be like "wtf... check?" and would be very tempted to stick in another bet. [/ QUOTE ] thanks, i actually messed up the math in my ev calculation. i redid it and the result is: if he bets just two or more combos of AA or KK when we check, then c/c becomes better than b/c. 
|
|
#12
10-16-2007, 07:00 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: KJo vs tighty
What about the turn in this hand? After the flop action this would be a check/fold for me. What do we beat here that someone who is not overly agressive would 3-b the flop with?
If we are calling to draw it seems like a marginal call to me getting 7,2-1 on a 5 out draw wich doesn't guarantee a win.
|
|
#13
10-16-2007, 09:38 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: KJo vs tighty
[ QUOTE ]
What about the turn in this hand? After the flop action this would be a check/fold for me. What do we beat here that someone who is not overly agressive would 3-b the flop with? If we are calling to draw it seems like a marginal call to me getting 7,2-1 on a 5 out draw wich doesn't guarantee a win. [/ QUOTE ] I would fold the turn as well unless we had a recent history or he was tilting.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
