Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-15-2007, 10:40 PM
efficacy efficacy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Thailand
Posts: 1,122
Default KJo vs tighty

Villain is 15/10/2.4 supernit

PokerStars $5/$10 Limit Hold'em - 5 players
Hand Converter Tool from DeucesCracked.com

Preflop: Hero is BB with K[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], J[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]
UTG calls, <font color="#FF0000">CO raises</font>, Button folds, SB folds, Hero calls, UTG calls.

Flop: (6.40 SB) J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 7[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 5[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font>
Hero checks, UTG checks, <font color="#FF0000">CO bets</font>, <font color="#FF0000">Hero raises</font>, UTG folds, <font color="#FF0000">CO 3-bets</font>, Hero calls.

Turn: (6.20 BB) Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
Hero checks, <font color="#FF0000">CO bets</font>, Hero calls.

River: (8.20 BB) J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
<font color="#FF0000">Hero bets</font> intending to call a raise.

edit: is folding pf out of the question?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-15-2007, 10:48 PM
JSmith2007 JSmith2007 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,151
Default Re: KJo vs tighty

I think preflop call is fine. I think you played it fine.

If he raises you, would 3-betting him be out of the question?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-15-2007, 10:53 PM
efficacy efficacy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Thailand
Posts: 1,122
Default Re: KJo vs tighty

I think 3b river is out of the question. My hand is pretty face up when I donk the river. I own myself by AJ QJ and QQ if I 3b the river.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-15-2007, 11:04 PM
rzk rzk is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 647
Default Re: KJo vs tighty

i really don't see what else you can do other than fold to a raise, which you probably don't have enough of a read to do. so yes, b/c imo and let him go on tilt with his AA or vomit and call when he raises with his AJ.

EDIT: ok, maybe a better analysis would be more valuable than saying i don't see what else you can do [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] . he has:

AJ - 3 combos
QQ - 3 combos
QJs - 1 combo

KK - 3 combos
AA - 6 combos

you are a 9:7 favorite. if you b/c, then there are 7combos where you lose 2BB and 9 combos where you win 1 BB, so you lose (14-9)/16combos=5/16BB.

if you c/c, then he will _probably_ check behind AA and KK so you'll lose 1BB*7combos/16combos=7/16BB.

therefore under these assumptions b/c&gt;c/c, but b/f would then be the best choice of all. but you probably can't comfortably fold if he raises. if we assume he bets or raises worse hands just enough for you to call, then we have to update our EV calculation as follows:

b/c wins 1BB in around 8 combos (if we move 1 combo of AA to the bluff area) and loses 1BB in around 8 combos (7 better ones + 1 worse one that he raises), so it wins 0.

c/c wins 0BB in around 8 combos and loses 0BB in 8 combos, so it also wins 0.

so in that case it doesn't matter what you do. however, note that if you check he may mistakenly assume you don't have a J and value-bet his AA. in that case, we have to add 1BB*5 combos/16combos= 5/16BB to your win. (i only took 5 combos of AA since i moved 1 combo to the bluff area to neutralize the EV of calling his bet). in that case c/c is the best option.

so the bottom line is:

1. if he can mistakenly value-bet worse hands, then c/c.
2. otherwise, if he can only raise better hands, then b/f.
3. otherwise, b/c or c/c, it doesn't matter.

given your description i'd go with c/c since point 1 looks plausible and you won't have the stomach to b/f anyway.

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-15-2007, 11:24 PM
TheHip41 TheHip41 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Every other month TAG
Posts: 5,237
Default Re: KJo vs tighty

I just fold PF, you are getting 5-1 with a reverse dominated hand.

looking at post flop, this is why I fold PF.

River I just bet/call and hope for the best.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-15-2007, 11:54 PM
rzk rzk is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 647
Default Re: KJo vs tighty

i edited my post to make it much longer and hopefully a little more useful. i forgot to consider that he can have KJ though. the only thing this changes is that you cannot b/f now. then it becomes a clear c/c, as my ev calc shows. depending on assumptions it's either clearly better than b/c or has the same ev.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-16-2007, 02:35 AM
Oink Oink is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: SLAAAYYYERRRR ! ! ! !
Posts: 4,226
Default Re: KJo vs tighty

how many hands is that over?

If its a significant sample I would fold preflop, but in the heat of the battle I might call missing his stats as its such a standard call for me.

Villain is SuitedKings?

If so you cant ever b/f. The guy is a tiltbox.

Without a very good read its a b/c. Even if you make the wrong decision and b/c its still prolly better than c/c as he is often checking KK and AA
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-16-2007, 02:45 AM
efficacy efficacy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Thailand
Posts: 1,122
Default Re: KJo vs tighty

[ QUOTE ]
how many hands is that over?

If its a significant sample I would fold preflop, but in the heat of the battle I might call missing his stats as its such a standard call for me.

Villain is SuitedKings?

If so you cant ever b/f. The guy is a tiltbox.

Without a very good read its a b/c. Even if you make the wrong decision and b/c its still prolly better than c/c as he is often checking KK and AA

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, that is him. I think I have ~400 hands on him.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-16-2007, 02:47 AM
efficacy efficacy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Thailand
Posts: 1,122
Default Re: KJo vs tighty

[ QUOTE ]
i edited my post to make it much longer and hopefully a little more useful. i forgot to consider that he can have KJ though. the only thing this changes is that you cannot b/f now. then it becomes a clear c/c, as my ev calc shows. depending on assumptions it's either clearly better than b/c or has the same ev.

[/ QUOTE ]

Good analysis. I know if I was villain on that river with AA or KK, I would be like "wtf... check?" and would be very tempted to stick in another bet.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-16-2007, 02:51 AM
Oink Oink is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: SLAAAYYYERRRR ! ! ! !
Posts: 4,226
Default Re: KJo vs tighty

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
how many hands is that over?

If its a significant sample I would fold preflop, but in the heat of the battle I might call missing his stats as its such a standard call for me.

Villain is SuitedKings?

If so you cant ever b/f. The guy is a tiltbox.

Without a very good read its a b/c. Even if you make the wrong decision and b/c its still prolly better than c/c as he is often checking KK and AA

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, that is him. I think I have ~400 hands on him.

[/ QUOTE ]

Then I am not sure that you should c/r the flop.

He will 3 bet better hands and prolly fold worse pairs right there. (Not sure about the last)

But I am sure that he will fold overcards on the turn.

So just c/c c/c bet/fold would be my play. And then watch him bitch in the chat as he called with AK

EDIT: I am assuming he is firing 2 barrels with overcards.

EDIT: My God that guy is bad!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.