Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Tournament Poker > MTT Strategy
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 10-13-2007, 05:10 PM
mikeJ mikeJ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Back to Berkeley
Posts: 2,065
Default Re: Intended Stop and Go flops set

I'm not a big fan of the stop 'n go.

Pre, i'd just move AI or fold depending on what I think his opening range is.

As played, definitely bet turn. I would check river. What do you expect him to call you with, 9T? JJ? Occasionally yes, but not enough to outweigh the times you run into a stray 8x. Bet sizing matters too. If you're 2/3rd potting river, it's really hard for you to get called by a worse hand. If you bet like 40% pot, you may induce a bluff, which is a disaster.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-13-2007, 10:07 PM
NorthernGuy NorthernGuy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Great White North
Posts: 389
Default Re: Intended Stop and Go flops set

I'd say you should have carried through with the stop-n-go move... it would have surely looked like one and might have got a call for looking like a bluff.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-13-2007, 10:30 PM
hamnegger hamnegger is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,986
Default Re: Intended Stop and Go flops set

i think this hand stunk by both guys(i can say this bc i can admit i stink it up sometimes too) theutg raiser should shove pre. if not hes gotta be raising w plan to shove flop regardless. his check is terrible bc hes got to post bb sb next hands.your call stinks donking off chips w sp and then shoving into utg raiser who is short too and put in 1/3 his stack? id fold if i were you. as played id check flop too, bc i cant see him checking behind as he did, and check turn but shove the river as a "bluff"
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-13-2007, 11:58 PM
blankoblanco blankoblanco is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: fistpumping
Posts: 943
Default Re: Intended Stop and Go flops set

[ QUOTE ]
[ ] I like the SNG with 55
[x] I agree with Dunkman completely on that

[x] Flop check maybe exploitable & maybe bad game theory wise
[x] I like the flop check

[x] Leading turn is a better way of getting value
[x] As played lead river

[/ QUOTE ]

[x] checkboxes have killed the english language forever
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-14-2007, 01:33 AM
MJBuddy MJBuddy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,513
Default Re: Intended Stop and Go flops set

I think most of you are losing a bunch of equity by leading river.

I like the flop check, and I think you MUST bet the turn here, but leading the river is a never-fold situation and you've waited till your hand is the weakest of any street to make your move.

If you check river, you're beating far more hands that are betting into you (that will even call a check/raise from you). If you bet river, hands that you're beating will fold, and these same hands will check behind. Net change 0 equity. Straights will jam into you, overpairs + TT-JJ (which are really less likely here) will jam into you /call (but they'd bet into you on this river here), other sets will jam into you (of which you're losing to).

So you're hoping to make up for all the hands you're folding by Qx hands and some 9x hands calling you here.

I think that leading river has a smaller expected value than check/raising it.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.