#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200NL Blind battle wtf?
Fold. F*ck knows what he has - nothing makes sense, but this kind of overbet shove raise at this level is a big hand more often than not.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200NL Blind battle wtf?
[ QUOTE ]
Value-bluffing means you sometimes get villain to fold a better hand, sometimes get villain to call with worse. I presume he means 76 instead of 87. There is absolutely no value in a raise with 87 here. [/ QUOTE ] I'm probably using it incorrectly but when I say "value bluff" I mean when someone pulls a totally retarded move by turning a hand with showdown value into a huge bluff that will never get called by worse, which is what villain may have done with 87 here. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200NL Blind battle wtf?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Value-bluffing means you sometimes get villain to fold a better hand, sometimes get villain to call with worse. I presume he means 76 instead of 87. There is absolutely no value in a raise with 87 here. [/ QUOTE ] I'm probably using it incorrectly but when I say "value bluff" I mean when someone pulls a totally retarded move by turning a hand with showdown value into a huge bluff that will never get called by worse, which is what villain may have done with 87 here. [/ QUOTE ] lol thats just bluffing [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img] no need for your fancy jargon. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200NL Blind battle wtf?
thanks guys, I thought a fold was probably best as I almost have to be beat here though I have no idea what he has. I didn't think he was too capable of a bluffraise so maybe just flopped a set or something and slowplayed
|
|
|