Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 08-22-2007, 09:28 PM
dnord dnord is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Mpls MN
Posts: 178
Default Re: not thinking enough about small stacks?

This discussion opens my eyes a little bit, but I think I'm already going in the right direction.

I don't necessarily want to play for (mini-micro-)stacks here, so I felt like my normal c-bet-raise-thing might be over the line, since it's basically committing him to the pot (without the benefit of super-dramatic all-in fold equity). I think I might want to practice pot control here, whether I'm ahead or behind. My point was really that I was getting him all-in without even realizing it, and I wasn't 100% sure I wanted to do that.

But everyone else is pretty much dead-on with what I was thinking: I love playing shortstack donks because I'm always pleasantly surprised to find that they're pushing crap. I even love it when they hit their monsters, because I'm paying them 1:1 to hit crazy 10:1 shots. So I get all that. Thanks.

He flipped over K9o for two pair, and I'm no good. But the next 20 short-stack donks will turn over A4o, K3o, QTo, 98s, and a medley of worthless pocket pairs, so I'm pretty sure I'm good with my call.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-22-2007, 09:29 PM
MoP_86 MoP_86 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 271
Default Re: not thinking enough about small stacks?

does anyone fold preflop?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-22-2007, 09:31 PM
11t 11t is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,167
Default Re: not thinking enough about small stacks?

Standard imo
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-22-2007, 09:37 PM
marvin_1935 marvin_1935 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 769
Default Re: not thinking enough about small stacks?

[ QUOTE ]
does anyone fold preflop?

[/ QUOTE ]

not 5 handed
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-22-2007, 09:44 PM
MoP_86 MoP_86 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 271
Default Re: not thinking enough about small stacks?

how about 6 handed?

I have a hard time playing KQ oop
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 08-22-2007, 09:46 PM
yapee yapee is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 101
Default Re: not thinking enough about small stacks?

I like to give the shortstack last say in the hand. Even if his AI is less than 1/2 PSB he will think he has some folding equity and stack lighter, while if we push he may get scared w/ some hands he'd happily push himself.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-22-2007, 10:28 PM
calmB4storm calmB4storm is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Fluffy White Clouds
Posts: 1,120
Default Re: not thinking enough about small stacks?

[ QUOTE ]
Had he donked with a proper sized bet you would have had to fold

[/ QUOTE ]
For real?
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 08-22-2007, 11:31 PM
wooziephantom wooziephantom is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 173
Default Re: not thinking enough about small stacks?

Amen Mop 86... I def fold this pf
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 08-22-2007, 11:57 PM
cooker3 cooker3 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 708
Default Re: not thinking enough about small stacks?

This is a insta call against a short stacker, they can have anything here, tp is the nutz against these guys. Ul this time
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 08-23-2007, 12:14 AM
corsakh corsakh is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Kitty said what?
Posts: 3,991
Default Re: not thinking enough about small stacks?

Your giving villain way too much credit. Its the easiest hand ever.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.