|
|
#11
07-28-2007, 06:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100-200 hand played by a novice
[ QUOTE ]
Anyone else just generally appalled by the title of this thread? [/ QUOTE ] No. Anyone can play any game they want. I've played with people at 100/200 that probably spend half their lives wallowing around in their own feces because they're so stupid and I've played 5/10 online with some extremely strong players that are forced to play smaller as a result of temporary bankroll constraints. 
|
|
#12
07-28-2007, 07:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 100-200 hand played by a novice
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I would raise again on 3rd but failing that I would for sure c/r 4th. [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] Agree, except I think leading 4th is reasonable as IMO loingpoker probably started with a draw and therefore may be checking behind on 4th after bricking. After checking I definitely prefer c/rz to c-call though.
|
|
#13
07-28-2007, 07:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 100-200 hand played by a novice
[ QUOTE ]
Anyone else just generally appalled by the title of this thread? No other comments. [/ QUOTE ] Money is all relative. Some people drop down to 100-200 to let off steam or try a new game. Some people play 1k/2k NL/PLO for the same purpose.
|
|
#14
07-28-2007, 07:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 100-200 hand played by a novice
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I would raise again on 3rd but failing that I would for sure c/r 4th. [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] Agree, except I think leading 4th is reasonable as IMO loingpoker probably started with a draw and therefore may be checking behind on 4th after bricking. After checking I definitely prefer c/rz to c-call though. [/ QUOTE ] I completely agree.
|
|
#15
07-28-2007, 09:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 100-200 hand played by a novice
So are you a high stakes player in something else who has the skill and money to try a new game at this level? Or are you a wealthy amateur who can afford to play these limits? Or did you just decide to take shot at this?
|
|
#16
07-29-2007, 01:46 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 100-200 hand played by a novice
I just suffered the horrendous beat of reading the whole hand history and then seeing that AndyB had converted it. Or maybe I'm just stupid. I don't see value in betting the river, though. Inducing a bluff has to be better. Bet/fold must be better than bet/call, though, unless there's some sick meta-nonsense which there clearly isn't.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
