|
|
#31
07-22-2007, 06:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: QQ Vs. Nazgul @ 3/6
wtf you talking about man? I didn't ever say QQ was a bluff here. I wanted to ask what people thought about shoving the river here assuming we knew his range was AA and KK. I was just trying to add some more discussion to my thread, not saying that I heavily considered shoving in this spot.
And that flop bet can easily be AA-QQ. 
|
|
#32
07-22-2007, 07:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: QQ Vs. Nazgul @ 3/6
[ QUOTE ]
And that flop bet can easily be AA-QQ. [/ QUOTE ] of course, but i hope his range is wider than that ....otherwise, hes just a nit, and not this great "10/20 SH pro" you make him out to be, sitting in his throne stroking his pussy
|
|
#33
07-22-2007, 07:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: QQ Vs. Nazgul @ 3/6
Of course it's wider than AA-QQ you douche, nobody was debating that. I'm asking how much his flop range shifts from flop CB to river bet. Can you go troll somewhere else?
|
|
#34
07-22-2007, 07:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: QQ Vs. Nazgul @ 3/6
I think you are making this hand way way more complicated than it is. After you checked turn and only called preflop, you should call river unless he is a huge nit.
It wont matter that much one way or the other though. Since Naz is good he won't bluff river often enough to make calling hugely +EV, just like he won't be big enough of a nit to make folding easy.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
