Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Tournament Poker > STT Strategy
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 07-13-2007, 12:20 AM
cougar62 cougar62 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 485
Default Re: 6.50 stars....ICM says push, would you?

sorry, the T6 was soooted [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img], but anyway played around with it, and his range doesn't matter anyway, but yes when you tighten up the SB it becomes a fold.

Question about the software itself, does it develop a model for individual villians based on their play? It does seem to give me fairly loose ranges most of the time.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-13-2007, 12:24 AM
BigCummins BigCummins is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Davenport
Posts: 528
Default Re: 6.50 stars....ICM says push, would you?

I would never call here.

The default ranges on sngwiz are the reason i dont mind everyone and their mom using it these days
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-13-2007, 12:30 AM
ChipLeader ChipLeader is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 285
Default Re: 6.50 stars....ICM says push, would you?

[ QUOTE ]
I widened the SB because he was retarded. He ended up showing T6o. UTG was a little loose but maybe I overestimated that one...Wiz's default range was 16. But yeah, I'm ok with SB's range. But yeah given the ranges above, and the default ranges Wiz gave it was a push.

[/ QUOTE ]

SB basically called (technically a push but with 0 FE same as a call), for his tournament with a whole orbit of free hands coming, with T6o?! I may not be qualified to give advice on $6 SnGs, i dont know how a player that bad would still be around at these blinds. I seriously struggle to believe he had T6.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-13-2007, 12:58 AM
cougar62 cougar62 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 485
Default Re: 6.50 stars....ICM says push, would you?

PokerStars Game #10906492237: Tournament #55292197, $6.00+$0.50 Hold'em No Limit - Level VII (100/200) -

{hand edited}

*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 3070 | Rake 0
Board [5d 3c Kd 2d 4s]
Seat 1: "Hero" (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 3: "SB" showed [7c 7d] and lost with a pair of Sevens
Seat 4: xxxxx folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 5: xxxxx folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 7: xxxxx (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 9: "donk" (small blind) showed [Th 6h] and won (3070) with a straight, Deuce to Six
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-13-2007, 06:07 AM
PokahPokah PokahPokah is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: FT Cash
Posts: 533
Default Re: 6.50 stars....ICM says push, would you?

[ QUOTE ]

Seat 9: "donk" (small blind) showed [Th 6h] and won (3070) with a straight, Deuce to Six

[/ QUOTE ]

just lol
its at times like this you wonder if these people are cheats and know what cards are coming
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 07-13-2007, 06:20 AM
Genetix Genetix is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: London, UK
Posts: 33
Default Re: 6.50 stars....ICM says push, would you?

Cougar, SNGWiz doesn't "develop" models of any kind because unlike progs such as PA-PRO it has no AI. What it does do is alter call/shove ranges for villains based on position and relative stack sizes. How it does these interpolations is a little murky and not very well explained, however there is a little bit of info in the "opponent modeling" section of the reference lit.

The guys you were playing were unbelievable! As has been said 8-10% seems more realistic for a reasonable player UTG. I'd fold 99 to a UTG raise like that, but am beginning to wonder if I'm giving these folks way too much respect!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.