Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 06-21-2007, 03:09 PM
Nielsio Nielsio is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 10,570
Default Re: Ron Paul being excluded again!!

It's the information guerilla [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 06-21-2007, 03:25 PM
Vagos Vagos is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Relegated to the #2 Seed
Posts: 944
Default Re: Ron Paul being excluded again!!

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Yet they invited Tommy Thomson, Duncan Hunter, and Tom Tancredo??

[/ QUOTE ]
All of them have a much smaller kook factor than Paul.

[/ QUOTE ]

Sorry, I just don't buy it. I think it's a case of excluding someone who is a bigger threat to the main candidates (in this case, apparently Romney).

If the "kook factor" argument was true, these three guys wouldn't have been invited either. But of course they all were, because they pose absolutely no threat whatsoever.
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 06-21-2007, 05:08 PM
rpr rpr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hollywood Hills Adjacent
Posts: 230
Default Re: Ron Paul being excluded again!!

bkholdem, you make my head hurt.

Follow this: NAFTA induces illegal immigration. Illegal immigrants cause support for national ID cards. New illegal immigration bill includes aspects of SPP/NAU ---> threat to national sovereignty.

Those who support managed trade programs are enabling and exploiting the illegal immigration issue (e.g. support of Reconquista, national ID cards, subsidizing illegals/devaluing our dollar) to further their Utopian dreams of a North American Union.

I completely agree with your perspective on the War on Terror. However, there are real terrorists out there. If we are spending billions and invading privacy for airline security it only makes logical sense to secure the border. Although I'm skeptical of the terrorist threat, since we've had zero attacks since 9/11 and I'd think Virgina style massacres would be common if there were really suicide terrorists in the country.

I'm against fractional reserve banking, the IRS, Communist-ideals in our government and the fact that people slave to survive by supporting a fragmented-based energy economy (when a better system is possible). I'm also completely against collectivism and allowing someone else to tell me how to live.

Who's side do you think I'm on? I'm lost.
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 06-21-2007, 05:10 PM
rpr rpr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hollywood Hills Adjacent
Posts: 230
Default Re: Ron Paul being excluded again!!

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Elaborate on what you mean by "kook" factor?

[/ QUOTE ]
Voting against most appropriations bills, wanting to get rid of the Federal Reserve and Social Security, that kind of thing. Basically, all of the things people around here like him for that no other Politician likes.

[/ QUOTE ]
Your logic is kooky and quite depressing.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.