|
|
#11
06-02-2007, 11:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: mathematically perfect poker
If you played mathematically "perfect", couldn't YOU tell US how you would do? I mean, there's got to be a formula...
|
|
#12
06-03-2007, 12:36 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: mathematically perfect poker
Check the top players at www.officialpokerrankings.com
The answer is they make it into the money 15-20% of the time. Considering that 10% of the field is usually ITM, a good player can expect to get there twice as often. I'd venture to say that if you're better than 20%, you're probably too tight and may be losing money in the long run.
|
|
#13
06-03-2007, 12:43 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: mathematically perfect poker
[ QUOTE ]
I'd venture to say that if you're better than 20%, you're probably too tight and may be losing money in the long run. [/ QUOTE ] Anything to back this up? I'd actually be curious to see any data that can support this...would be interesting.
|
|
#14
06-03-2007, 01:05 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: mathematically perfect poker
No, just a hunch, based on a friend of mine who prides himself on his 29% ITM record, yet has negative ROI over 500-something MTT's at the 20+2 level. He likes to play super-tight at the bubble, even folding big hands (99, TT etc.) so he can eke into the money with zero risk of busting out near the bubble. He cashes a hell of a lot more than I do, but he almost never goes deep.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
