#161
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Would a shorstack boycott on PS work?
i don't know why mods don't move these threads to the internet forum or lock them
|
#162
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Would a shorstack boycott on PS work?
[ QUOTE ]
If anything needs to be 'checked' its which high stakes players have AIM open getting live advice on hands in real time. THAT is cheating. [/ QUOTE ] One player to a hand rule does not exist online. It's not cheating. |
#163
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Would a shorstack boycott on PS work?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] If anything needs to be 'checked' its which high stakes players have AIM open getting live advice on hands in real time. THAT is cheating. [/ QUOTE ] One player to a hand rule does not exist online. It's not cheating. [/ QUOTE ] Can you direct me to the rules where it says its OK? And if something like that 'does not exist online' neither does ratholing you idiots. |
#164
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Would a shorstack boycott on PS work?
Rules don't tell you what is permitted, they tell you what is forbidden. You're just as dense as the other guy.
|
#165
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Would a shorstack boycott on PS work?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] If anything needs to be 'checked' its which high stakes players have AIM open getting live advice on hands in real time. THAT is cheating. [/ QUOTE ] One player to a hand rule does not exist online. It's not cheating. [/ QUOTE ] Can you direct me to the rules where it says its OK? And if something like that 'does not exist online' neither does ratholing you idiots. [/ QUOTE ] i know at least stars has specifically okayed multiple people playing the same hand. i dont have a link but im sure you can find it if you try hard enough. |
#166
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Would a shorstack boycott on PS work?
I'd be fine if they left the min buyin at 20bb , but what I would REALLY like to see is an anti-ratholing policy. Whatever you have on the table you have to buy back in for if you were on the table within 3 hours time.
|
#167
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Would a shorstack boycott on PS work?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] If anything needs to be 'checked' its which high stakes players have AIM open getting live advice on hands in real time. THAT is cheating. [/ QUOTE ] One player to a hand rule does not exist online. It's not cheating. [/ QUOTE ] Can you direct me to the rules where it says its OK? And if something like that 'does not exist online' neither does ratholing you idiots. [/ QUOTE ] i know at least stars has specifically okayed multiple people playing the same hand. i dont have a link but im sure you can find it if you try hard enough. [/ QUOTE ] Or he could use common sense, if he had any. |
#168
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Would a shorstack boycott on PS work?
[ QUOTE ]
And if something like that 'does not exist online' neither does ratholing you idiots. [/ QUOTE ] And I didn't say ratholing was illegal you moron, it's just unethical and annoying. People are pushing for it to become illegal, fool. |
#169
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Would a shorstack boycott on PS work?
[ QUOTE ]
I'd be fine if they left the min buyin at 20bb , but what I would REALLY like to see is an anti-ratholing policy. Whatever you have on the table you have to buy back in for if you were on the table within 3 hours time. [/ QUOTE ] There is no such thing as ratholing online. Ratholing is taking money off the table WHILE IN A GAME. Duh |
#170
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Would a shorstack boycott on PS work?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] And if something like that 'does not exist online' neither does ratholing you idiots. [/ QUOTE ] And I didn't say ratholing was illegal you moron, it's just unethical and annoying. People are pushing for it to become illegal, fool. [/ QUOTE ] Ratholing is taking money off the table while in a game. It is not leaving a game, cashing out and then buying into another game. Nor is ratholing buying back into the game at a later time. Playing more than one player to a hand is most certainly unethical as is uising PAHUDS and other such devices. I don't care if it's annoying. Some people think checkraising is annoying. Some people think rocks are annoying or lags. Poker players cutting each others throats to get at a gambling addicts morgage payment talking about ethics. You crack me up. |
|
|