Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 04-21-2007, 03:55 PM
yad yad is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: stealing the button
Posts: 1,546
Default Re: Pot control gone bad

tufat,
don't you think villain plays weaker aces this way? It's kinda stupid, true, but I see it all the time nonetheless.

So I wouldn't fold this. The whole point of checking this flop is to call this bet.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-21-2007, 06:19 PM
Pegasus Pegasus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Shooting my neighbors Pit Bull
Posts: 129
Default Re: Pot control gone bad

[ QUOTE ]
I don't like the flop but whatev.

[/ QUOTE ]

Am I stupid...why are we checking this flop anyway?

TPTK
Position
We have initiative as PF Raiser

Im lost...(laughing at me is okay but please give commentary [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-21-2007, 07:44 PM
Acevader Acevader is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 614
Default Re: Pot control gone bad

No need to be lost IMHO. You are only beat, realistically, by 77 and 44 with AA being an outside possibility. A7 would suck but with some opponents is a possibility. That flop is perfect for AK and you should bet for value every time in the hope that a weaker kicker or weaker hand makes a mistake in getting involved.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-21-2007, 07:47 PM
Womble Womble is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: STUDENT!
Posts: 2,307
Default Re: Pot control gone bad

Flop check is fine since the board is really dry - I still bet it a lot though
Turn call is fine
River is a fold - looks like a set/2pair
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-21-2007, 08:21 PM
Trader_Joe Trader_Joe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 171
Default Re: Pot control gone bad

[ QUOTE ]
No need to be lost IMHO. You are only beat, realistically, by 77 and 44 with AA being an outside possibility. A7 would suck but with some opponents is a possibility. That flop is perfect for AK and you should bet for value every time in the hope that a weaker kicker or weaker hand makes a mistake in getting involved.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't think 20/8 open limps UTG with ace-rag. There is no valuebetting to speak of. I like the flop check. Based on my experience, the river is a fold. UTG had a set.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 04-21-2007, 11:54 PM
Pegasus Pegasus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Shooting my neighbors Pit Bull
Posts: 129
Default Re: Pot control gone bad

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
No need to be lost IMHO. You are only beat, realistically, by 77 and 44 with AA being an outside possibility. A7 would suck but with some opponents is a possibility. That flop is perfect for AK and you should bet for value every time in the hope that a weaker kicker or weaker hand makes a mistake in getting involved.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't think 20/8 open limps UTG with ace-rag. There is no valuebetting to speak of. I like the flop check. Based on my experience, the river is a fold. UTG had a set.

[/ QUOTE ]

Is this determined because he checks and leads for PSB on turn and river?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.