|
|
#41
04-13-2007, 07:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: MLB top 40 trade value, 2007
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I'm a huge angels homer and there is no way Lackey should be on that list [/ QUOTE ] lackey is awesome. what's his contract look like though? James [/ QUOTE ] He is awesome but he probably shouldn't have made the list. The fact that he is the top Angel is laughable. 
|
|
#42
04-14-2007, 12:36 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: MLB top 40 trade value, 2007
[ QUOTE ]
I realize they get docked for high salaries but they should find a spot for these guys on the list. Especially because guys who don't have huge contracts now probably will in a few years. [/ QUOTE ] That's a great point. Sure, Ryan Howard at $900,000 in 2007 is sick, but the guy is going to be getting a monster contract in 2008. That needs to be considered. Also, Cole Hamels should be higher. Why is he below Brett Myers?
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
