![]() |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] clear Mr Dawkins sir? [/ QUOTE ] What's clear is your analogy doesn't represent ID. Even the founder of Dawkinsim admits "biological life has the appearance of design." Now do you get it? [/ QUOTE ] Even though you won't, you should read The Blind Watchmaker. [/ QUOTE ] I've quoted one of the relevant passages from Blind Watchmaker for NR already in this thread, but don't worry, NR is already fully apprised of the thoughts and ideas of Richard Dawkins. |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] clear Mr Dawkins sir? [/ QUOTE ] What's clear is your analogy doesn't represent ID. Even the founder of Dawkinsim admits "biological life has the appearance of design." Now do you get it? [/ QUOTE ] Even though you won't, you should read The Blind Watchmaker. [/ QUOTE ] I've quoted one of the relevant passages from Blind Watchmaker for NR already in this thread, but don't worry, NR is already fully apprised of the thoughts and ideas of Richard Dawkins. [/ QUOTE ] Who could be so expert on his works without reading them? NotReady = Richard Dawkins doesn't sound so silly now, heh!. chez |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
NotReady = Richard Dawkins doesn't sound so silly now, heh!. [/ QUOTE ] Hey! Hey! Keep a civil tongue in your head. [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img] |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Even if new evidence made ID a rational belief it wouldn't make the irrational beliefs before that evidence emerged and more rational. [/ QUOTE ]Dear Chezlaw, This is exactly the kind of erroneous thinking I was talking about. I'll let others elaborate. Best wishes, Mickey Brausch |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Even if new evidence made ID a rational belief it wouldn't make the irrational beliefs before that evidence emerged and more rational. [/ QUOTE ]Dear Chezlaw, This is exactly the kind of erroneous thinking I was talking about. I'll let others elaborate. Best wishes, Mickey Brausch [/ QUOTE ] You've misunderstood. I'll let other elaborate. chez |
![]() |
|
|