#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Me and registrar disagree: Limp-calling with suited connector
[ QUOTE ]
So your plan is to hit 2 pair or better? [/ QUOTE ] That's the hope. Or a draw. We're not getting the odds for this and we're OOP so 'outplaying' is somewhat difficult and we should let this go. I often don't because I see 95k chips and get overexcited but I am a donk. This is nowhere near close enough to make the gamble for a big stack worthwhile and while 50k is not a big deal any attempt to take the pot down post-flop could end up costing us a lot more. Is everybody happy now? I have a theory but it is not well served by this hand. Anyway, assuming reraiser is SB, does everyone still drop this? |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Me and registrar disagree: Limp-calling with suited connector
[ QUOTE ]
So your plan is to hit 2 pair or better? [/ QUOTE ] I have tried that plan before. In my experience, it works about as often as it should. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Me and registrar disagree: Limp-calling with suited connector
[ QUOTE ]
Anyway, assuming reraiser is SB, does everyone still drop this? [/ QUOTE ] I already said I call in position. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Me and registrar disagree: Limp-calling with suited connector
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Anyway, assuming reraiser is SB, does everyone still drop this? [/ QUOTE ] I already said I call in position. [/ QUOTE ] Position is probably a disadvantage, given that the pot is almost the size of villain's stack on the flop. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Me and registrar disagree: Limp-calling with suited connector
i think, barring a severe blow to your opponents head post flop, it's probably impossible to play this profitably. (doesnt matter if he's the button or the SB; it sucks either way)
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Me and registrar disagree: Limp-calling with suited connector
i think the open limpers stack size makes this a fold, less of a chance button is ufckin around with so few BB in MP1s stack.
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Me and registrar disagree: Limp-calling with suited connector
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Anyway, assuming reraiser is SB, does everyone still drop this? [/ QUOTE ] I already said I call in position. [/ QUOTE ] Position is probably a disadvantage, given that the pot is almost the size of villain's stack on the flop. [/ QUOTE ] Who pays attention to stack sizes? lol. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Me and registrar disagree: Limp-calling with suited connector
[ QUOTE ]
i think, barring a severe blow to your opponents head post flop, it's probably impossible to play this profitably. (doesnt matter if he's the button or the SB; it sucks either way) [/ QUOTE ] ya. You can't call the first time either because the original limper is way too short. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Me and registrar disagree: Limp-calling with suited connector
[ QUOTE ]
Is everybody happy now? I have a theory but it is not well served by this hand. [/ QUOTE ] Guess the vote is pretty unanimous reg [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] I think it's cool that you bring stuff like this up though, I think a lot of hands are routinely discarded that can contain some value due to various factors. This just isn't one of them I guess. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Me and registrar disagree: Limp-calling with suited connector
[ QUOTE ]
it's impossible to play this profitably. [/ QUOTE ] |
|
|