![]() |
|
View Poll Results: Is this a really dumb idea and will it work? | |||
Yes, you'll probably get free stuff but you're still dumb |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
17 | 70.83% |
I've done this, you'll be cool like me |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 | 4.17% |
This is stupid give me my five minutes back! |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
3 | 12.50% |
Why do they call french fries freedom fries? |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 | 8.33% |
You make spaceman bryce seem like a quality poster! This will not work and you'll waste postage. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 | 4.17% |
Voters: 24. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
AQ, and in my mind it's not close. [/ QUOTE ] |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] 77 vs tightish opponents AQ vs loose ones [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] this is correct [/ QUOTE ] I agree here. I voted for AQ because I was pegging the limpers as loose/weaker players based on their limps (assuming this was 6max, that's my game and all I'm really used to). If the limpers were tighter (as you'd expect in a full ring game), then 77 is probably better. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
LOL, AQ>>>JJ, let alone mere walking stix. Search the archives, n00bs.
|
![]() |
|
|