|
|
#21
10-11-2006, 08:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: This is why I Love Pokerstars
[ QUOTE ]
The Stars site talks about a number of Internt sites they are responsible for. So, when you guys refer to PokerStars, what exactly do you mean? Tx. [/ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Speak for yourself. These moron made it impossible for me to even create a new account due to garbage they planted all over my computer. [/ QUOTE ] What are you babbling about? 
|
|
#22
10-11-2006, 10:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: This is why I Love Pokerstars
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Are these prizes won or the equivalent buy-in totals? [/ QUOTE ] Prizes won. The buy-in totals that I've used FPP's for would be $810 (2 $215 Sunday's and 1 $380 satelitte). There are no buy-in's associated with all of the freeroll's listed. [/ QUOTE ] You can't include money won with sat seats, just the buy ins, that defeats the entire purpose of the calculation. [/ QUOTE ] I respectfully disagree. Without the "freeroll" (i.e., using FPP's for the buy-in) into the Sunday Million, I never would have entered. That cash is a direct result of the VIP program. The purpose of the calculation is what have I gotten back out of the Stars VIP program. The answer is 35.6% effective rakeback at the Platinum level.
|
|
#23
10-11-2006, 10:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: This is why I Love Pokerstars
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Are these prizes won or the equivalent buy-in totals? [/ QUOTE ] Prizes won. The buy-in totals that I've used FPP's for would be $810 (2 $215 Sunday's and 1 $380 satelitte). There are no buy-in's associated with all of the freeroll's listed. [/ QUOTE ] You can't include money won with sat seats, just the buy ins, that defeats the entire purpose of the calculation. [/ QUOTE ] I respectfully disagree. Without the "freeroll" (i.e., using FPP's for the buy-in) into the Sunday Million, I never would have entered. That cash is a direct result of the VIP program. The purpose of the calculation is what have I gotten back out of the Stars VIP program. The answer is 35.6% effective rakeback at the Platinum level. [/ QUOTE ] I respectfully disagree with you. Under your rakeback calculation method, if you won the Sunday Million that would mean your rakeback % was like 30000 % or some random #.
|
|
#24
10-12-2006, 12:44 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: This is why I Love Pokerstars
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Are these prizes won or the equivalent buy-in totals? [/ QUOTE ] Prizes won. The buy-in totals that I've used FPP's for would be $810 (2 $215 Sunday's and 1 $380 satelitte). There are no buy-in's associated with all of the freeroll's listed. [/ QUOTE ] You can't include money won with sat seats, just the buy ins, that defeats the entire purpose of the calculation. [/ QUOTE ] I respectfully disagree. Without the "freeroll" (i.e., using FPP's for the buy-in) into the Sunday Million, I never would have entered. That cash is a direct result of the VIP program. The purpose of the calculation is what have I gotten back out of the Stars VIP program. The answer is 35.6% effective rakeback at the Platinum level. [/ QUOTE ] I respectfully disagree with you. Under your rakeback calculation method, if you won the Sunday Million that would mean your rakeback % was like 30000 % or some random #. [/ QUOTE ] I play low-limit limit ring games and I am a supernova. The total "rakeback" value I recieve from the VIP program is far far higher than 28%. But that's not the point of this thread. The point is that Stars Rocks!
|
|
#25
10-12-2006, 01:09 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: This is why I Love Pokerstars
[ QUOTE ]
Under your rakeback calculation method, if you won the Sunday Million that would mean your rakeback % was like 30000 % or some random #. [/ QUOTE ] That is correct. If I never would have played without the VIP program, how could I not credit the proceeds as a benefit of the VIP program. Explain that to me and I will agree with you.
|
|
#26
10-12-2006, 01:13 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: This is why I Love Pokerstars
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Under your rakeback calculation method, if you won the Sunday Million that would mean your rakeback % was like 30000 % or some random #. [/ QUOTE ] That is correct. If I never would have played without the VIP program, how could I not credit the proceeds as a benefit of the VIP program. Explain that to me and I will agree with you. [/ QUOTE ] Wow.
|
|
#27
10-12-2006, 01:19 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: This is why I Love Pokerstars
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Under your rakeback calculation method, if you won the Sunday Million that would mean your rakeback % was like 30000 % or some random #. [/ QUOTE ] That is correct. If I never would have played without the VIP program, how could I not credit the proceeds as a benefit of the VIP program. Explain that to me and I will agree with you. [/ QUOTE ] *laughs out loud* Okay dude.
|
|
#28
10-12-2006, 01:41 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: This is why I Love Pokerstars
bball you sound like my roomate trying to explain his "winning strategy" to playing online blackjack. Like I told him, you're reasoning can only possibly make sense to you
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
