grunch

[MrWookie]

I figured, but I don't want the n00bs posting in this thread to get the wrong idea. I'm kind of primed for this, because I just got done with a review session where I railed on the guy for putting people on hands, usually hands he had beaten.

[jrz1972]

Something is messed up in the preflop action.

Anyway, the turn raise looks fine to me. I call down from the 3-bet.

[Xhad]

If villain is passive then the turn raise sucks. Actually it may suck anyway because QQ- knows it's toast by now, KQ- at least shuts down (unless it's a flush) and AA/KK were killing you and still are. Also sometimes LRRs are BS suited connectors but if that's what he has he just turned a flush. This is one of those times you have a great hand but it can't really go to war because your opponent can't have many worse hands, and should know he's beat even if he has them.

[detruncate]

[ QUOTE ]
You asking us to grunch this? What hands could UTG possibly have here? How many ways can he have them? How many outs do you have against the things that beat you?

[/ QUOTE ]

Seriously. You have a lot of info. Count combinations of likely hands and compare your chances of winning against them to your effective odds.