#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: (215) Semi-deep stacked top pair with nut flush draw
I would have checked the flop, then pushed over him if he bet as weak as you did. If he bet big (committed), then I'd just fold.
I don't think you represent any decent ace when you limp and then open after the flop with barely half a pot. You bet too much for a set, I think, so he's going to put you on exactly what you have, a weak ace at best. If I was him and had AQ or AJ, I'd make you play for your stack right now. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: (215) Semi-deep stacked top pair with nut flush draw
i dont mind a c/r AI on the flop but i dont think bet/3bet is that bad either
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: (215) Semi-deep stacked top pair with nut flush draw
no CR? i suppose you are kinda deep, but im assuming villian is a donkey because of his stack and call PF, i would expect him to bet and it seems like there is more value there.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: (215) Semi-deep stacked top pair with nut flush draw
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] His huge raise and huge stack basically pot comitted himself to the pot. Since he limped from early position, you must assume he has at least a big ace, if not a set of 9s or (less likely) a set of 4s made. You are probably going to find yourself at the very best, be a slight underdog in this pot. I would fold, unless I have a read knowing he is tricky agressive / or can lay down a big hand (like TPTK to a big 3rd reraise all in). [/ QUOTE ] How can you fold even if you're a slight underdog... what about the pot odds? [/ QUOTE ] cEV doesnt equal $EV |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: (215) Semi-deep stacked top pair with nut flush draw
I play it the same way. Btw you should have an idea of what he's limping with there if you've played with him before.
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: (215) Semi-deep stacked top pair with nut flush draw
looks all reasonable to me although I'd probably check the flop, but really either seems fine.
|
|
|