Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Medium Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 08-17-2006, 10:23 AM
yvesaint yvesaint is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 12,779
Default Re: Set of 10\'s on a dangerous board - 2/4 NL

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
AA and 88 cancel each other out, both are calling.

[/ QUOTE ]
AA and 88 do NOT cancel each other out, because 88 is like a million times more likely.
Also, nobody is EVER folding a flush.

[/ QUOTE ]

65d on a 4-flush turn NEVER folds? I flatly disagree. 76? 87?
88 may be more likely, but doesn't affect the results because all the $$ goes in on turn anyway then. Hero bets, he shoves, or Hero shoves, Villain calls. No diff, he's got his one out.


[/ QUOTE ]

waddafck are you talking about. are you saying wait for a 4th diamond then shove to fold out worse flushes??

also if 88 is more likely of course that affects the hand. that means more hands we beat and less hands we dont beat, i mean duh
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 08-17-2006, 10:25 AM
yvesaint yvesaint is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 12,779
Default Re: Set of 10\'s on a dangerous board - 2/4 NL

[ QUOTE ]

If we are behind 80% of the time, we shove and get called;
Villain's equity is 66%, giving him 53% of pots.

a]20% of time we are ahead but he will suck out 35% when he calls, making us 13% Net to win those hands, [and giving Villain 7%]
b]we are behind 80% of time *34% equity against his flush = 27% to win.
c] Therefore our Fold Equity must make up the difference, to get him to fold 17% of the times he is ahead, {which equals 60%} to make shoving EV=0.
{Assumes AA and 88 cancels for ease of use}

IF, however, we assume we are only behind 60% of the time, then it's an easy shove because we will
a] suck out 20% [33%*60%],
b] stay ahead 40%*65% = 27%, and as long as
c] our FE is >6% it's +EV to shove.

I think. Gladhanding, brickbats, and witheringly [correct] criticism welcomed.

Naj

[/ QUOTE ]

you are never folding out a flush w/a flop push lmao. put your FE on flop v. flushes at 0 pls
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 08-17-2006, 04:46 PM
NajdorfDefense NajdorfDefense is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 8,227
Default Re: Set of 10\'s on a dangerous board - 2/4 NL

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

If we are behind 80% of the time, we shove and get called;
Villain's equity is 66%, giving him 53% of pots.

a]20% of time we are ahead but he will suck out 35% when he calls, making us 13% Net to win those hands, [and giving Villain 7%]
b]we are behind 80% of time *34% equity against his flush = 27% to win.
c] Therefore our Fold Equity must make up the difference, to get him to fold 17% of the times he is ahead, {which equals 60%} to make shoving EV=0.
{Assumes AA and 88 cancels for ease of use}

IF, however, we assume we are only behind 60% of the time, then it's an easy shove because we will
a] suck out 20% [33%*60%],
b] stay ahead 40%*65% = 27%, and as long as
c] our FE is >6% it's +EV to shove.
Naj

[/ QUOTE ]

you are never folding out a flush w/a flop push lmao. put your FE on flop v. flushes at 0 pls

[/ QUOTE ]

Fine, so if we are behind 80% time, we should not shove. That's pretty much my point. I think that makes sense and is easy to understand, no?

Naj
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.