deep with set, too weak?

[DJ Sensei]

[ QUOTE ]
Is there any merit to betting 200 on the turn with these stacks?

[/ QUOTE ]

No. It lets Villain play way too easily, and will cost us EV whether ahead or behind.


OP, I think you played this hand very well.

[Kilillan]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Is there any merit to betting 200 on the turn with these stacks?

[/ QUOTE ]

No. It lets Villain play way too easily, and will cost us EV whether ahead or behind.


OP, I think you played this hand very well.

[/ QUOTE ]

eh, just speculating, not suggesting it

[DJ Sensei]

no worries. that move would be much better suited to a board with more semibluffing possibilities, and if hero had made such moves semi-frequently in the past.

[amoeba]

I play this the same.

[UOPokerPlayer]

I doubt raising on the later streets gets called by a worse hand. 56 anyone?

[klonpucko]

as everyone and their grandma suspected, he had an OESD that filled up on the turn. i suspected he did but folding is obviously out of the question so i payed him off. it itched in my push-finger though :S

[spino1i]

I like it. I dont think he's calling a raise without a straight or AA. I feel like he doesnt make this move with an A as his hand would have showdown value and he wouldnt try to pump the pot up. So its either a monster or air/busted draw here (and I think air/busted draw most of the time).