|
|
#41
05-10-2006, 06:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ping poll
[ QUOTE ]
NO i dont use that word in that manner, and if someone said something along those lines to me I woudl just turn and walk away with fear of other peopel noticing that i was associating with such a wierdo. [/ QUOTE ] This about sums it up for me 
|
|
#43
05-10-2006, 06:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ping poll
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] You guys really got confused by this? Come on, guys. [/ QUOTE ] I must say I was/am flummoxed. Q2#3 seems redundant. Or it's some kind of question-answering skill-tester. Perhaps just a little slaphappy today. [/ QUOTE ] It's because a large number of people will answer both polls . If the 3rd option wasn't there I bet a large number of people would have voted for the second.
|
|
#44
05-10-2006, 07:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ping poll
[ QUOTE ]
It's because a large number of people will answer both polls . If the 3rd option wasn't there I bet a large number of people would have voted for the second. [/ QUOTE ] Apparently 2/3rds of the voters thought that way. What about Q2#1-2 having 23 replies while Q1#1 has 20. Thankfully American Idol is on in less than two hours. That should distract me from this confusion.
|
|
#45
05-10-2006, 07:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ping poll
BVT,
"What about Q2#1-2 having 23 replies while Q1#1 has 20." Yes, that is indeed an indicator of some dumb-assness. The third answer was put in the poll for two reasons: 1) Give "no" answerers a way to see results of that poll. 2) Make it less likely that "no" answerers end up accidentally answering and thus screwing up results of second poll.
|
|
#47
05-10-2006, 09:24 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ping poll
It always irritates me when people use the word ping in this context. If you are one of those people, I have lost whatever remaining shred of respect I may have had for you.
|
|
#49
05-10-2006, 10:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ping poll
Great movie...
Yugoslav
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
