Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Medium Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 04-29-2006, 12:49 AM
Woolygimp Woolygimp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dodging bans since \'03.
Posts: 3,042
Default Re: KK v tight-passive/passive, good river fold?

I have hundred of thousands of hands worth of full ring experience. This is an easy call.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-29-2006, 12:50 AM
PunchyPlay PunchyPlay is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 217
Default Re: KK v tight-passive/passive, good river fold?

What type of read would you have to have for it to be a fold?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-29-2006, 12:51 AM
crego20 crego20 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 291
Default Re: KK v tight-passive/passive, good river fold?

I gave up, he made my head hurt [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-29-2006, 12:52 AM
Woolygimp Woolygimp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dodging bans since \'03.
Posts: 3,042
Default Re: KK v tight-passive/passive, good river fold?

[ QUOTE ]
What type of read would you have to have for it to be a fold?

[/ QUOTE ]

My opponent flipping over the winning cards.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-29-2006, 12:53 AM
PunchyPlay PunchyPlay is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 217
Default Re: KK v tight-passive/passive, good river fold?

Well I'm not trying to be a dick... just want as much input as possible. I have about 500k hands at 1/2 NL full ring at party and I usually make this call but after running into this situation 100s of times I thought I'd try something different.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 04-29-2006, 12:58 AM
PunchyPlay PunchyPlay is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 217
Default Re: KK v tight-passive/passive, good river fold?

Well... against some of the nits at party you'd honestly be chip spewing calling this. I wouldn't call this guy a nit but what reason do I have to call besides that calling is the "standard" play? Getting all-in with kk pre is "standard" but against certain players KK is an autofold if they try to get all-in, I think this is a similar sort of situation.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 04-29-2006, 01:02 AM
PunchyPlay PunchyPlay is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 217
Default Re: KK v tight-passive/passive, good river fold?

Maybe this was a dumb post I guess it's based mostly on reads, hard to ask other people for advice on reads
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 04-29-2006, 03:40 AM
billyjex billyjex is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,918
Default Re: KK v tight-passive/passive, good river fold?

omfg call

tight players still like to draw to the nuts
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.