|
|
#1
08-17-2007, 07:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Mid pair vs passive donk bettor
matrix_555: posts the small blind $0.50
HERO: posts the big blind $1.00 --- DEALING POCKETS HERO is dealt [Ts,Jh] scaper2727: calls $1.00 SliMMyFiSh: folds matrix_555: calls $0.50 HERO: checks --- DEALING FLOP [4c,Js,Ah] matrix_555: bets $1.00 HERO: ... Sorry I couldn't find a bodog hand converter. Anyhow, donk bettor is 74/20/1.15. The pot is small, board is ragged, and bettor is pretty passive, so I think this is a muck. Had this been heads up, I think I would call down. Thoughts? 
|
|
#4
08-17-2007, 07:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Mid pair vs passive donk bettor
[ QUOTE ]
He isn't passive. He also probably raises alot of aces PF against an open limper. I would call the flop and reevaluate the turn. [/ QUOTE ] he seems loose-passive to me...
|
|
#5
08-17-2007, 07:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Mid pair vs passive donk bettor
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] He isn't passive. He also probably raises alot of aces PF against an open limper. I would call the flop and reevaluate the turn. [/ QUOTE ] he seems loose-passive to me... [/ QUOTE ] The idea is that for a given AF a higher VPIP means that the player is more aggro since he sees more flops(?). Someone can prolly tell you why as I dont understand the argument [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]
|
|
#6
08-17-2007, 07:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Mid pair vs passive donk bettor
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] He isn't passive. He also probably raises alot of aces PF against an open limper. I would call the flop and reevaluate the turn. [/ QUOTE ] he seems loose-passive to me... [/ QUOTE ] The idea is that for a given AF a higher VPIP means that the player is more aggro since he sees more flops(?). Someone can prolly tell you why as I dont understand the argument [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] you mean the ratio of agression relative to flops seen?
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
