Mid pair vs passive donk bettor
 

matrix_555: posts the small blind $0.50
HERO: posts the big blind $1.00
--- DEALING POCKETS
HERO is dealt [Ts,Jh]
scaper2727: calls $1.00
SliMMyFiSh: folds
matrix_555: calls $0.50
HERO: checks
--- DEALING FLOP [4c,Js,Ah]
matrix_555: bets $1.00
HERO: ...


Sorry I couldn't find a bodog hand converter. Anyhow, donk bettor is 74/20/1.15. The pot is small, board is ragged, and bettor is pretty passive, so I think this is a muck. Had this been heads up, I think I would call down. Thoughts?

Re: Mid pair vs passive donk bettor
 

He isn't passive. He also probably raises alot of aces PF against an open limper. I would call the flop and reevaluate the turn.

Re: Mid pair vs passive donk bettor
 

First of all this guy is definitely not passive!!!

I'd call the flop.

Re: Mid pair vs passive donk bettor
 

[ QUOTE ]
He isn't passive. He also probably raises alot of aces PF against an open limper. I would call the flop and reevaluate the turn.

[/ QUOTE ]

he seems loose-passive to me...

Re: Mid pair vs passive donk bettor
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
He isn't passive. He also probably raises alot of aces PF against an open limper. I would call the flop and reevaluate the turn.

[/ QUOTE ]

he seems loose-passive to me...

[/ QUOTE ]

The idea is that for a given AF a higher VPIP means that the player is more aggro since he sees more flops(?). Someone can prolly tell you why as I dont understand the argument [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]

Re: Mid pair vs passive donk bettor
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
He isn't passive. He also probably raises alot of aces PF against an open limper. I would call the flop and reevaluate the turn.

[/ QUOTE ]

he seems loose-passive to me...

[/ QUOTE ]

The idea is that for a given AF a higher VPIP means that the player is more aggro since he sees more flops(?). Someone can prolly tell you why as I dont understand the argument [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

you mean the ratio of agression relative to flops seen?