Difference between $3.40 and $6.50

[h3llo7]

A while back I was 6 tabling the 3.40s on Stars and had about a 32% ROI over a sample of about 500... I was wondering how much of a difference there is in the level of play at those compared to the $6.50 level. I believe I have the capability to show a profit at that level but I just wanted to check the difference in the level of play. Thanks [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[Mark1978]

I can't say first hand but I'm sure the reduced rake will make up for any increase in skill (although 32% seems high at any level these days).

[Hollandicus]

$3.10

[jafeather]

[ QUOTE ]
$3.10

[/ QUOTE ]

NH

[AMT]

you have a very small sample, but i dont anticipate the 6.50s to be hard enough to not make it worth while between reduced rake and general quality of play if youre rolled

[taipan168]

Not much difference in the quality of play. It's been a while since I've played any $6.50s but I've reviewed lots of HHs for others and the standard of play is still horrible.

As others have said, the reduced % rake will make up for any reduction in ROI due to less horrible play compared to the $3.40s.

[trontron]

the 6.50s are a lot better than the 3.40s, but still easy beatable and quite bad. the 6.50s standardplayer is a bit tighter and knows a lil bit about pushmode. but still easy. if you have the bankroll, play the 6.50s