![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Villain had very tag-like stats.
Full Tilt Poker No Limit Holdem Ring game Blinds: $0.25/$0.50 5 players Converter Stack sizes: Hero: $109.25 CO: $52.25 Button: $21.25 SB: $98.75 BB: $78.25 Pre-flop: (5 players) Hero is UTG with <font color="#cc0000">Hero raises to $2</font>, 3 folds, BB calls. Flop: ($4.25, 2 players)BB checks, <font color="#cc0000">Hero bets $4</font>, BB calls. Turn: ($12.25, 2 players)BB checks, <font color="#cc0000">Hero bets $7</font>, BB calls. River: ($26.25, 2 players)BB checks, <font color="#cc0000">Hero bets $8</font>, <font color="#cc0000">BB raises to $22</font>, Hero calls. Results: Final pot: $70.25 99/100 I laydown to this river c/r but I felt that I had a good read that this type of player does not play this hand this way with a flush draw or a straight. I felt that they could have had top pair. If the T on the flop is not a spade but the 8 is a space I make this laydown. Your thoughts on possible range of villain here and how wise a call is? Thanks, Wally |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
This river bet looks awful to me. Its just asking to get check-raised and its spewing to call one. The turn card was bad but not nasty. The river was awful for you *everything* just got there.
Just check behind and be happy to show down your set without any further aggro. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
What is a good size then for my river bet or is there no such thing because this should be an automatic check and showdown regardless of any reads.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Unless villain is a HUGE station your bet has no value. What do you think he's calling with here that you beat?
Edit: thought you were first to act, I check behind. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
I really wanna see a showdown here for a lot of reasons, so I check behind.
1. See his hand: Lets get a little bit clearer of a read 2. I have showdown value 3. I dont wanna be c/r, since this actually is a bad card v. a good card for you. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'd make a decision on the turn, things are getting unpleasant, but BB is not doing much.
I either check for pot control, or I bet the pot. Bet the pot is my default here, I am ahead might as well get some more in the middle. I am ready to throw it away if all goes wrong on the river, coz there are still plenty of yummy implied odds available given stack sizes. $7 has fallen between two stools. River. Well its all gone horribly wrong but thank goodness villian has checked coz I am checking behind just about everytime (barring some sort of brainstorm). If villian shows me the flush I laugh in his tricky playing face. But you have choosen a really weak river bet which can open the door for a river bluff. Either way that check raise has now made life a lot more misreable. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks everyone, after seeing this now I see that this is an easy check and showdown.
Last comment is that the villain here was a thinking player and he saw he could attack. When I called he showed AdTd. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
I would check the turn for pot control. That wasn't the best card to fall tbh. River is the most obvious check in the history of poker. Squeezing another $8 from someone with a crappy TP or w/e is not worth the risk.
|
![]() |
|
|