Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-16-2006, 12:39 AM
reecelights reecelights is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Waitin\' for the Stork
Posts: 881
Default NL50 No read vs UTG Limper

Villain's 14th hand at table, no previous hands against him.

At this table he has played one hand: he limped PF and bet at T66 flop (won pot). I have raised three pots, including a reraise on teh flop and turn of one hand, taking down a $19 pot. I raise preflop the next hand but have not played a hand in the orbit since.

1. After his check/call on flop I put him on a mid pair or two Broadways, possibly a weaker suited Ace. Is this a reasonable range?
2. What is my plan on the turn and river if we get there?

Ultimate Bet
No Limit Holdem Ring game
Blinds: $0.25./$0.50.
6 players
Converter

Pre-flop: (6 players) Hero is CO with 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]
UTG calls, UTG+1 folds, Hero calls, Button folds, SB calls, BB checks.

Flop: 7[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] ($2, 4 players)
SB checks, BB checks, UTG checks, <font color="#cc0000">Hero bets $2</font>, SB folds, BB calls, UTG folds.

Turn: K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] ($6, 2 players)
BB checks, Hero ?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-16-2006, 12:45 AM
DJSHAD0W DJSHAD0W is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 266
Default Re: NL50 No read vs UTG Limper

IMO you are often behind to a bigger PP on the flop.
This turn seems to be OK since what would someone limp UTG that has you beat but AA. I dont think KK gets limped UTG too often but possible.
I would check the turn and call smallish river bet (mabye 2-3$ if you want)- pot control !!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-16-2006, 12:48 AM
holdme holdme is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: 100k in 20 days
Posts: 6,277
Default Re: NL50 No read vs UTG Limper

Pot control check like mad.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-16-2006, 01:01 AM
Panthro Panthro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Checking flops
Posts: 1,745
Default Re: NL50 No read vs UTG Limper

check behind, value bet river.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-16-2006, 01:18 AM
reecelights reecelights is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Waitin\' for the Stork
Posts: 881
Default Re: NL50 No read vs UTG Limper

Forgot to include stack sizes originally. Here's the river:

Ultimate Bet
No Limit Holdem Ring game
Blinds: $0.25./$0.50.
6 players
Converter

Stack sizes:
UTG: $20.05
UTG+1: $23
Hero: $81.95
Button: $16.85
SB: $11.70
BB: $49.20

Pre-flop: (6 players) Hero is CO with 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]
UTG calls, UTG+1 folds, Hero calls, Button folds, SB calls, BB checks.

Flop: 7[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] ($2, 4 players)
SB checks, BB checks, UTG checks, <font color="#cc0000">Hero bets $2</font>, SB folds, BB calls, UTG folds.

Turn: K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] ($6, 2 players)
BB checks, Hero checks.

River: 8[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] ($6, 2 players)
<font color="#cc0000">BB bets $4</font>, Hero ?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-16-2006, 02:51 AM
Antinome Antinome is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,640
Default Re: NL50 No read vs UTG Limper

pot control is betting 4 on the turn instead of 6.

Do some more pot control on the river after the draw has missed if you like.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-16-2006, 02:55 AM
holdme holdme is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: 100k in 20 days
Posts: 6,277
Default Re: NL50 No read vs UTG Limper

[ QUOTE ]
pot control is betting 4 on the turn instead of 6.

Do some more pot control on the river after the draw has missed if you like.

[/ QUOTE ]
No, no it's not. Building pots with marginal hands when wa/wb is not a good idea.

Call River.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-16-2006, 03:25 AM
Antinome Antinome is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,640
Default Re: NL50 No read vs UTG Limper

There are only 2 Aces left in the deck and it seems unlikely given action that anyone has one. Just because you can imagine that someone might have a better hand doesn't make you WA/WB.

The most likely villian hands are club draws with suited connecters and medium PPs. Charge them for the river, and stop seeing slowplayed monsters.

If he's got an A, he'll let you know on the turn when you bet, and you will lose exactly the same as you would on the river, but with the added benefit of also charging worse hands to draw.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-16-2006, 08:59 AM
Lifthanger Lifthanger is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: in the mood
Posts: 238
Default Re: NL50 No read vs UTG Limper

we're behind most kings too and I don't see many drawing hands against us. I check the turn behind.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-16-2006, 09:03 AM
Unknown Soldier Unknown Soldier is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,587
Default Re: NL50 No read vs UTG Limper

[ QUOTE ]
There are only 2 Aces left in the deck and it seems unlikely given action that anyone has one

[/ QUOTE ]

where did you get that from? Everyone slow plays an A here

fold pf K7 is trash, check everything, keep this pot small. I'd be inclined to c/f actually. As played fold river.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.