Sustaining a 31BB/100 Winrate at NL - I'm Doing It - Page 5

Big_Jim · #41 12-15-2006, 04:59 PM

[ QUOTE ]
LMAO 99%? Being a bit unreasonable here?

[/ QUOTE ]
LMAO, don't know [censored] about statistics, here?

Gonso · #42 12-15-2006, 05:09 PM

thac · #43 12-15-2006, 05:12 PM

[ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

winnar

skoal2k4 · #44 12-15-2006, 05:17 PM

i call [censored]

T-God · #45 12-15-2006, 05:17 PM

Only up to 1/2?

That's right. It's significant.

ASPoker8 · #46 12-15-2006, 05:30 PM

[ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

KurtSF · #47 12-15-2006, 05:56 PM

[ QUOTE ]
do you use winhold'em or have you written your bot from scratch?

[/ QUOTE ]

terp · #48 12-15-2006, 05:59 PM

[ QUOTE ]
I'm pretty sure 15+ptbb/100 is easily attainable for a good player at 100-200nl. At Party anyway... I've sustained 10ptbb/100 over 70k hands 6-tabling and I suck at poker.

[/ QUOTE ]

jay, there are a lot of us who still mourn party poker. please don't talk about her like she's still out there.

CamelZoo · #49 12-15-2006, 06:06 PM

I would like to test your theory with as many 1-2 tables as you wish HU

Little_Luck · #50 12-15-2006, 06:56 PM

Hey Gary, reading apparently isn't your friend...

"I figured out a system of play, after playing 3 million hands of poker and creating about 6 different strategy systems, that yields about 30BB/100 as a winrate at the low stakes levels (25c/50c - $1/2) NL."

You failed, nice try though.