Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Poker > Omaha High
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-08-2006, 08:07 PM
wiggs73 wiggs73 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 6,256
Default Aces vs. what are obviously aces 100 PLO

This is probably a retarded question, but I actually am not sure, so I'll just ask...

PokerStars Pot-Limit Omaha High, $1.00 BB (8 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: 2+2 Forums)

BB ($39.30)
UTG ($47)
UTG+1 ($91.55)
Hero ($254.55)
MP2 ($101.85)
CO ($53.10)
Button ($40.65)
SB ($88.30)

Preflop: Hero is MP1 with A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 2[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img].
<font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, UTG+1 calls $1, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to $4.5</font>, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, Button calls $4.50, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, <font color="#CC3333">UTG+1 raises to $19.5</font>, Hero calls $15, <font color="#CC3333">Button raises to $40.65</font>, <font color="#CC3333">UTG+1 raises to $91.55</font>, Hero folds

Ok, so I have aces, great. I'm 99% certain that EP also has aces though, so now basically I'm playing a 1 pair hand vs. 2 other players and I really don't have much else working for me. I def. would have called if I had some straight / flush possibilities but really the only thing that can work for me here is the jack. So at best, I think I'm splitting villain #2s money, who is short (which also factored into my decision) and more likely, probably splitting, or even losing, a side pot.

If anything is terribly off in my line of thinking please correct me.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-08-2006, 08:16 PM
piiop piiop is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: always record
Posts: 3,848
Default Re: Aces vs. what are obviously aces

I think calling the limp reraise was bad. When it's back to you the first time, you have to make the decision to go allin or fold there.

The way you played it it's just a math problem that I'm sure Silent A would like to do for you.

Also, your stacks are off if UTG+1 has 91.85 but raises to 110.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-08-2006, 08:21 PM
wiggs73 wiggs73 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 6,256
Default Re: Aces vs. what are obviously aces

edited that, not sure what happened in the converter. also, ty beset for adding the stakes to the title, i'll do that myself in the future.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-08-2006, 11:09 PM
jlacks jlacks is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 17
Default Re: Aces vs. what are obviously aces 100 PLO

First, you can't just assume an opponent has aces here, especially at this level. Second, the single most important fact about aces is they play better heads-up. So just reraise preflop and hope the button folds. Either way you are committed now so enjoy the variance.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-09-2006, 12:53 AM
aba20 aba20 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 2,201
Default Re: Aces vs. what are obviously aces 100 PLO

Putting in 15 dollars then folding is very bad. You aren't deep enough to pass aces even these very weak ones. I would have repotted the limp reraise all in. I would also have limped preflop. I think the deception of hitting a set out ways the small equity gained by raising these junky aces.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-09-2006, 02:06 AM
Silent A Silent A is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: out of the grid
Posts: 2,838
Default Re: Aces vs. what are obviously aces

[ QUOTE ]
The way you played it it's just a math problem that I'm sure Silent A would like to do for you

[/ QUOTE ]

Hmm. Am I becoming the resident PLO mathematician?

It'll cost you about $72.50 to stay in a pot that's about $150 (after rake) so you're getting about 2.1 to 1 (i.e. you need 32% or more equity to call).

It's kind of hard to make a good estimate of your equity but the worst case scenario (against a double suited medium run and better aces) is that you have about 20% of the main pot and 40% of the side pot. The main pot will be about $120 and the side pot about $100 so a call here is worth at least 0.2*120 + 0.40*100 = $64.

That's close to a worst case scenario. It wouldn't take much for you to be about 30% in the main pot and 60% in the side pot (0.3*120 + 0.6*100 = $96). Obviously a no-brainer call here.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-09-2006, 09:42 AM
wiggs73 wiggs73 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 6,256
Default Re: Aces vs. what are obviously aces

Thanks everyone for the replies, I definitely learned a thing or 2.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-09-2006, 10:50 AM
heresjohnny heresjohnny is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 289
Default Re: Aces vs. what are obviously aces

Easy easy all in after UTG+1s lr.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.