bad_ip vs ip-control

GAL · #1 04-10-2006, 07:35 PM

ip-control (Prahlad?) has just won 140k pot with QQ vs bad_ips K8s to take him upto 190k

Kharnage · #2 04-10-2006, 07:40 PM

ip-control is per ummer, not prahlad.

PartyGirlUK · #3 04-10-2006, 07:56 PM

Those names are very similar, has anyone investigating whether they are colluding?

bonlins · #4 04-10-2006, 07:59 PM

how would one go about colluding in a heads up game?

Arnfinn Madsen · #5 04-10-2006, 08:00 PM

[ QUOTE ]
how would one go about colluding in a heads up game?

[/ QUOTE ]

By keeping the pots small to minimize rake.

tomtemor · #6 04-10-2006, 08:08 PM

[ QUOTE ]
ip-control is per ummer, not prahlad.

[/ QUOTE ]

You know this for sure?

Hendricks433 · #7 04-10-2006, 08:10 PM

[ QUOTE ]
By keeping the pots small to minimize rake.

[/ QUOTE ]
this is still stupid. Do you see why?

italianstang · #8 04-10-2006, 08:20 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
By keeping the pots small to minimize rake.

[/ QUOTE ]
My response is stupid. Do you see why?

[/ QUOTE ]

fyp

fslexcduck · #9 04-10-2006, 09:56 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
how would one go about colluding in a heads up game?

[/ QUOTE ]

By keeping the pots small to minimize rake.

[/ QUOTE ]

ok this makes a lot of sense. very possible collusion, but don't you think they would try to maybe not have such similar names because it is so obvious?

jhall23 · #10 04-10-2006, 10:04 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
how would one go about colluding in a heads up game?

[/ QUOTE ]

By keeping the pots small to minimize rake.

[/ QUOTE ]

ok this makes a lot of sense. very possible collusion, but don't you think they would try to maybe not have such similar names because it is so obvious?

[/ QUOTE ]

Higher level thinking duck. They know that since they are so similar it will look suspicious, therefore the sites will see it is so obvious and say there is no way that these 2 are actually colluding but in fact they are.