![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My friend is asking me for advice on his NCAA tournament pool. This is the situation;
First Prize pays $1500, second place is $375. Apparently second place is locked up already. My friend wins the pool outright if UCLA beats LSU. If LSU beats UCLA, "Arnie" wins. He wants to offer Arnie a deal, to reduce variance. Neither of us has any idea how to go about doing this, mostly because we have no idea how to translate the lines on the game into a % for each team winning. I'm looking for a starting point in how to help him approach the deal. What % would be neutral EV, and then let him bargain from there. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Arnie should get about $850, given the current moneyline on the game.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here's the way to think about it:
Both are guaranteed $375. So this game is worth the difference in first and second, which is $1500-$375 = $1125. The probability of UCLA winning is about 43% (based on odds I found at pinnaclesports.com, a reliable and sharp sportsbook). The way to find this is to observe that the moneyline is LSU -138, UCLA +126. The "average" here is 132. So consider a "fair" line to be UCLA +132. Betting $100 on UCLA returns $0 for a loss and $232 for a win, so the fraction of the time UCLA has to win to make this profitable is 100/232, which is 43.1%. Your friend's equity is (0.43)*($1125) = $484 (rounded). So your friend deserves $375 guaranteed PLUS the expected $484. 375+484 = $859. So as Doug said, $850 is a pretty reasonable settlement. This would leave $925 for Arnie. (Note that Arnie's equity is (0.57)*(1125) = $641, and that 375+641 = 916 = 1875-859, as we would expect.) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Actually, I interpreted the question differently than you did.
My $850 estimate was for Arnie, and was based on the assumption that some other guy (neither his friend, or Arnie) had 2nd place locked up but couldn't win first. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I interpreted the situation the same as you did: I thought a third party had already locked up 2nd place and $375 of the prize pool. I can't be sure if this reading is correct, of course.
I assumed 3rd place paid nothing (which may not be true) but if it is, the amount risked, their "buy-in," is relevant and we need to know this number to quantify the risk, the loss if a certain outcome happens. So is this the situation? 1st: $1,500 2nd: $375 3rd: Loss of "buy-in." |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Also important to note that your friend could bet LSU moneyline on a sportsbook (and pay vig) if Arnie doesn't want to deal (quite possible).
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Actually, I interpreted the question differently than you did. My $850 estimate was for Arnie, and was based on the assumption that some other guy (neither his friend, or Arnie) had 2nd place locked up but couldn't win first. [/ QUOTE ] Oh, right. I think your interpretation is correct. In that case I agree that it's (.57)(1500) = $855 for Arnie. My summary of calculating the 43% still stands though. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm sorry for being vague. You guys got it right, though it took a liberal interpretation.
A third party has already locked up second place. The two making a deal are going to get first or third based on the outcome of the LSU / UCLA game. Shouldn't change anything because you guys got it anyway. Rob |
![]() |
|
|