prima poker tight or fish??

[scorer]

How are the prima skins to play on..are there fish out there or tight games...i just opened a betholdem account.

[mc1]

I think it depends on your prefered game, prima tends to be NL orientated and hence more of the first are on the NL tables.

[Cheeseburglar]

I love these types of questions. "Where can I find the best games? Is site so and so full of fish or rocks?" etc etc. Why don't you go check it out for yourself? Because in the end, "it all depends". A player considered by fish by some may be considered good by another, and vice versa.

[Texibus]

I think it's a perfectly legit question to be asking. I know i want to get my money on a site where it is full of fish, and for most people on these boards say a place is chaulk full of fish it goes across the board for everyone.

I don't know much about Prima poker myself, but i've heard the tables aren't the softest to be playing on. If you are looking for easier competition i'd suggest Pacific poker. In my experience it's had the most loose passive players, and they have a pretty neat bonus method.

[mc1]

If you want somewhere choc full of fish you have to look at the sites without Poker Tracker compatibility, or the poker networks full of Euro sports bettors.

There are good and bad games on all sites, the key is finding a site with good game selection and the limits you play.

[Dazarath]

[ QUOTE ]
I think it's a perfectly legit question to be asking.

[/ QUOTE ]
It seems like it would be, but look at it this way. If I found some small unknown site with the most ridiculous, juicy tables ever. Do you think I'd come to 2+2 and tell everyone, "Hey, I found this site. It's sooo soft. There's an average of 6 players seeing each flop!!!" Basically, questions about which sites are the best are going to get varying answers, and the softest sites will never be listed. And we all already know the big sites.

[gila]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I think it's a perfectly legit question to be asking.

[/ QUOTE ]
It seems like it would be, but look at it this way. If I found some small unknown site with the most ridiculous, juicy tables ever. Do you think I'd come to 2+2 and tell everyone, "Hey, I found this site. It's sooo soft. There's an average of 6 players seeing each flop!!!" Basically, questions about which sites are the best are going to get varying answers, and the softest sites will never be listed. And we all already know the big sites.

[/ QUOTE ]

You would think this would be the case, although Bodog used to be full of fish, but then, a bunch of people here started saying "omg, bodog is so full of fish" and soon bodog was not as full of fish as it used to be. I am not saying that bodog no longer has fish, but the fish/shark ratio has changed a lot since people started talking it up on here. Why, however, I will never understand.

[smoore]

limit full ring = very few games, tend to be rocky
6max 1/2 = fishfest, you find some truly horrible players
NL = mix, table selection is paramount
6max NL = I don't know, too scared.

I usually just play prima for clearing bonuses, prime time seems to be noon to five EST. Late primetime for USA can be a rock garden.