Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Brick and Mortar
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-13-2006, 03:32 PM
ir0nphist ir0nphist is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: RI
Posts: 263
Default String bet ruling (Foxwoods ACT 3)

Is this really a string bet?
blinds 300/600

UTG limps, MP limps, BB checks

flop: T[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]8[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] BB thinks for a while before checking. . . checks around.

turn: Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]
again BB thinks before checking, UTG says "I raise", then proceeds to place 600 over the line before reaching back for another 1200 and placing that over the line.

BB immediately calls string bet. Floor is called and without hesitation rules that it was in fact a string bet due to the fact that UTG said "I raise" when there was no bet to him.
BB was obviously on a draw, the river blanked & an aggravated UTG pushes, BB folds.

I thought it was interesting that because UTG said "raise" his 1800 bet was disallowed.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-13-2006, 03:46 PM
h20man65 h20man65 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: middle ages..
Posts: 149
Default Re: String bet ruling (Foxwoods ACT 3)

Can't raise a non-bet, I think floor is correct.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-13-2006, 03:50 PM
Percula Percula is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 2,050
Default Re: String bet ruling (Foxwoods ACT 3)

[ QUOTE ]
Can't raise a non-bet, I think floor is correct.

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-13-2006, 04:02 PM
youtalkfunny youtalkfunny is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Exiled from OOT
Posts: 6,767
Default Re: String bet ruling (Foxwoods ACT 3)

He just bet 600.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-13-2006, 04:15 PM
ir0nphist ir0nphist is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: RI
Posts: 263
Default Re: String bet ruling (Foxwoods ACT 3)

I thought it was interesting because UTG's intentions were clear, he just screwed up by saying raise when there was no bet to him.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-13-2006, 04:56 PM
jba jba is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 9,596
Default Re: String bet ruling (Foxwoods ACT 3)

[ QUOTE ]
I thought it was interesting that because UTG said "raise" his 1800 bet was disallowed.

[/ QUOTE ]

no. he could have said "I like tacos", and then:

[ QUOTE ]
place 600 over the line before reaching back for another 1200 and placing that over the line.

[/ QUOTE ]

it's still a string bet. the bet is 600.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-13-2006, 09:02 PM
Hotrod0823 Hotrod0823 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,122
Default Re: String bet ruling (Foxwoods ACT 3)

What if he said "I raise to 1800" put out the 600 then goes back for 1200 more. That would be okay right?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-13-2006, 09:08 PM
Vern Vern is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Trying to understand SSHE
Posts: 2,185
Default Re: String bet ruling (Foxwoods ACT 3)

Yes, the verbal declaration counts since it came before any chips crossed the line.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-13-2006, 09:10 PM
BarronVangorToth BarronVangorToth is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: MEAN Streets of FAIRFIELD, CT
Posts: 4,607
Default Re: String bet ruling (Foxwoods ACT 3)

[ QUOTE ]
What if he said "I raise to 1800" put out the 600 then goes back for 1200 more. That would be okay right?

[/ QUOTE ]


Yes. This is one of the reasons why it is best to announce what you want to do.

IF there had been a bet in front of him of $600 and he said "raise," he could put out the $600 and then fiddle around until he figured out how much he wanted to make his raise.

Of the questionable rulings you will sometimes hear from the staff of Foxwoods, I don't think this is one of them.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-13-2006, 09:10 PM
the machine the machine is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: leveling myself
Posts: 4,975
Default Re: String bet ruling (Foxwoods ACT 3)

it is a string, if he says raise then puts in 1800 its still an 1800 bet wether he said raise or bet. you have to make one continuous motion to the pot be it with one hand or two and cannot go back to your stack,
unless
1. a raise of a persons bet is announced where that bet can be called before putting the raise in and a person can only go back to their chips at that time.
2. a verbal bet has been announced and enough chips have not been put into the pot.

since that guy really isnt raising anyone his 600 bet is just that
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.