#1
|
|||
|
|||
$16 - JJ vs raise
No reads/stats yet.
I sharkscoped the raiser and he was a marginal loser, -4% ROI. What to do? PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em Tourney, Big Blind is t30 (9 handed) by Hand Converter CG MP1 (t1265) MP2 (t1340) MP3 (t1195) CO (t1910) Button (t1425) Hero (t1430) BB (t1890) UTG (t1440) UTG+1 (t1605) Preflop: Hero is SB with J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], J[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]. <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, MP1 calls t30, <font color="#666666">3 folds</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Button raises to t150</font>, Hero ?? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $16 - JJ vs raise
If we re-raise to 500 we pretty much have to shove every flop OOP or commit to getting it in pre. Against a losing player I am re-raising here pf though with stack sizes it's kinda messy. Flatting and c/f non-J hi flops or less is kinda annoying. JJ vs a losing player should be played stronger than just looking for set value.
Tough spot tho I think. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $16 - JJ vs raise
flat call and get it in on an undercard flop.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $16 - JJ vs raise
I'm with criss
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $16 - JJ vs raise
What about pushing?
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $16 - JJ vs raise
I used to do this (push pre in this spot) a few months ago, but I think it pretty much alerts the other player that you don't have QQ/KK/AA. I don't think you get called that lightly here. Maybe TT calls, but otherwise you're racing or crushed.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $16 - JJ vs raise
I shove and get called by garbage all day.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $16 - JJ vs raise
Call and hope for a low card flop or the J to hit. Play post-flop poker (granted position sucks big time). If you raise to 450 or so, you're effectively committed, even if a Q-A hits.
Note that a 4% loser is beating his opponents, but not enough to cover the rake. I tend to look at those kind of players as having a clue about poker, but perhaps not a lot of SNG specific knowledge. If the sample size is large, they may be a positive player now, so looking at ROI over time is much more interesting than just a single number. Jeff |
|
|