Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Health and Fitness
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-08-2007, 11:23 AM
Wynton Wynton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: coping with the apokerlypse
Posts: 5,123
Default Wynton\'s routine needs help (long!, but funny little diagrams)

I'm afraid I can't solicit views without making this lengthy.

I'm about 170 lbs, around 5'9 1/2", soon to be 44 yrs old. My basic goals are to lose 5-8 pounds, maintain that weight and do the right amount of exercising that will help prevent injuries. Thus, I don't care at all about getting bigger for the sake of it. It's also important to note that I am a virtual free-weight newbie.

My routine for the last month or so is as follows. I play tennis (4.0-4.5) Tuesday and Friday mornings, between 60-90 minutes. I get to the gym (NYSC) Saturday, Sunday and either Wednesday or Thursday morning. Also, I've changed my diet a lot in the last couple of weeks, based upon much that I've read here.

Now, my schedule cannot change much, unless I am able to spend a lot less time in the gym each time I go. On the weekend, I spend an hour on an elliptical machine. The first 15 minutes are basically warming up. The next half hour is an interval program, which consists of alternating 2 minutes of genuine all-out sprinting, and then 2 minutes at a very easy pace. On the weekends, I then devote about 15 minutes to doing 4-5 nautilus machines (which will be posted below in photos). Each weekend day I use different machines, but there is little logic to my choices how I divide that up, frankly.

When I go to the gym once during the week, I go on the elliptical machine for just 30 minutes, 20 of which is the interval program I described above. Then I do all of the machines that I divided up during the weekend.

Before I discuss the machines, I'll mention a couple of other things. Perhaps the main reason for this post is that I assume I should be doing free weights instead; but I don't know which ones, or any other details. And, if possible, I would like suggestions about starting weights.

Also, most of these amounts will probably seem laughably trivial to most people here. They are based upon recommendations I received from a personal trainer nearly 2 years ago. (I stopped using the machines for about a year, before resuming a month ago.)

Finally, the machines and weights chosen are also based on some suggestions I had from a physical therapist once. In that regard, I note a few problem areas.

(1) Knees. I have some arthritis in the knees and do not want to overtax them.
(2) Shoulder. A couple of years ago, I had problem in one shoulder, which I think was diagnosed as a pinched nerve, resulting in some therapy. That problem has disappeared.
(3) Back. Almost like clockwork, every 3-4 months I pull a muscle in the upper/middle part of the back, not that far from the shoulder blades.

With all that in mind, here are the machines I use. Please suggest how I should transition to free weights (unless you think it's unnecessary).

On the machine below, I do 2 reps of 15, with the weight at 150 lbs. This weight is definitely too easy for me, but I haven't bothered to see how much higher it should go.




This machine actually causes some stress to my knees. Again, I do 2 reps of 15, but am only comfortable going at 50 lbs. I believe that amount is roughly appropriate for me.

For this machine, I do 2 reps of 15 at 90 lbs. This is another one which is definitely too easy for me. Maybe another 10-20 lbs would be difficult. (And remember, I'm using some of these amounts based upon an old recommendation.)


This is the hardest machine for me. I set it at 60 lbs (using the top set of handles), and can do 1 set of 15 comfortably, but a second set no more than 12 usually.

Same settings as the prior machine, though this one is easier. I can handle 2 reps of 15 without too much difficulty.


On this, I go at 50 lbs, once more doing 2 sets of 15. This weight could be increased probably another 10 lbs.


Same thing for this machine. I use 50 lbs, but could be 10-15 higher.


Aside from these machines, there is one I could not find a photo of. It is supposed to be for the back, and involves pulling handles that are straight in front of your body, until your elbows are behind you and your hands are near your chest. I go at 50 lbs, but this amount is far too little for me. I might be able to double that.

Lastly, I do an exercise recommended by a therapist for the shoulder. I take a 5 lb weight, raise my arm up until it is parallel to my shoulder, 15 times. I then do the same thing, with my arm pointed out at a 45 degree angle. I was told to use this small weight because of the shoulder injury, which no longer bothers me. So, I'm sure I could go a lot higher, but have no idea whether it's even worthwhile.

I thank you if you've had the patience to read all this. And I thank you even more if you can make suggestions how I can do better, keeping in mind that I can only get to the gym 3 times a week (which includes twice on the weekends), unless I spend considerably less time when I go.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-08-2007, 11:52 AM
Thremp Thremp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Free Kyleb
Posts: 10,163
Default Re: Wynton\'s routine needs help (long!, but funny little diagrams)

Squat/Deadlift/Bench/OH Press/Row
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-08-2007, 11:59 AM
Scary_Tiger Scary_Tiger is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,590
Default Re: Wynton\'s routine needs help (long!, but funny little diagrams)

[ QUOTE ]
Squat/Deadlift/Bench/OH Press/Row

[/ QUOTE ]

Knees/Shoulders/Back
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-08-2007, 12:01 PM
Thremp Thremp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Free Kyleb
Posts: 10,163
Default Re: Wynton\'s routine needs help (long!, but funny little diagrams)

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Squat/Deadlift/Bench/OH Press/Row

[/ QUOTE ]

Knees/Shoulders/Back

[/ QUOTE ]

Excuseaments?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-08-2007, 12:09 PM
shemp shemp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: www.twoplustwo.com
Posts: 2,733
Default Re: Wynton\'s routine needs help (long!, but funny little diagrams)

[ QUOTE ]

For this machine, I do 2 reps of 15 at 90 lbs. This is another one which is definitely too easy for me. Maybe another 10-20 lbs would be difficult. (And remember, I'm using some of these amounts based upon an old recommendation.)


This is the hardest machine for me. I set it at 60 lbs (using the top set of handles), and can do 1 set of 15 comfortably, but a second set no more than 12 usually.


[/ QUOTE ]

Putting you in a chair reduces the stimulus to rectus abdominus. The muscle recruitment diagram lies.

For the first: I think the pull-up is a great exercise.

For the second: The machine's stability may help you put more overhead--which may be a bad thing. Standing dumbbell press movements seem like a natural substitute.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-08-2007, 12:11 PM
shemp shemp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: www.twoplustwo.com
Posts: 2,733
Default Re: Wynton\'s routine needs help (long!, but funny little diagrams)

[ QUOTE ]

This machine actually causes some stress to my knees. Again, I do 2 reps of 15, but am only comfortable going at 50 lbs. I believe that amount is roughly appropriate for me.


[/ QUOTE ]

It hurts your knees and is generally a bad idea. Don't do that.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-08-2007, 12:14 PM
shemp shemp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: www.twoplustwo.com
Posts: 2,733
Default Re: Wynton\'s routine needs help (long!, but funny little diagrams)

[ QUOTE ]

On the machine below, I do 2 reps of 15, with the weight at 150 lbs. This weight is definitely too easy for me, but I haven't bothered to see how much higher it should go.





[/ QUOTE ]

Despite the best efforts of its designers to put you into an amenable position, I think this movement is quad dominated and that the muscle recruitment diagram lies.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-08-2007, 12:14 PM
qdmcg qdmcg is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: pittsburgh
Posts: 1,151
Default Re: Wynton\'s routine needs help (long!, but funny little diagrams)

wow nice thread, very detailed, etc.

I wish I could help but I'm pretty young and haven't had any injuries, etc. Maybe try doing some squats, DL's, etc. with really light weight to see if it aggravates your knees, etc? Unfortunately, I suspect that it might.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-08-2007, 12:17 PM
Wynton Wynton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: coping with the apokerlypse
Posts: 5,123
Default Re: Wynton\'s routine needs help (long!, but funny little diagrams)

Shemp,

First, thanks for the detailed responses.

Regarding your last post about the machine that has a "quad dominated movement," is that a bad thing? I thought that one general advice for people with knee issues was to strengthen the quads.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-08-2007, 12:18 PM
shemp shemp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: www.twoplustwo.com
Posts: 2,733
Default Re: Wynton\'s routine needs help (long!, but funny little diagrams)

[ QUOTE ]

On this, I go at 50 lbs, once more doing 2 sets of 15. This weight could be increased probably another 10 lbs.


Same thing for this machine. I use 50 lbs, but could be 10-15 higher.



[/ QUOTE ]

You can just cut this stuff out. If you are doing some kind of pressing and pulling, even merely push-ups and pull-ups, your arms will be fine. If you like to do it, that's fine, too. It seems to me that if you can only do a couple of exercises, that sticking to major movements and cutting these out is a no-brainer.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.