#1
|
|||
|
|||
$22 interesting back-to-back hands against same villain
Party Poker
No Limit Holdem Tournament Blinds: t50/t100 6 players Converter Stack sizes: UTG: t3050 UTG+1: t2000 CO: t4020 Button: t8090 Hero: t1790 BB: t1050 Pre-flop: (6 players) Hero is SB with Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 3 folds, Button calls t100 <font color="aaaaaa">(pot was t150)</font>, Hero calls t50 <font color="aaaaaa">(pot was t250)</font>, BB checks. Flop: A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (t300, 3 players) Hero checks, BB checks, <font color="#cc0000">Button bets t800</font>, Hero calls t800 <font color="aaaaaa">(pot was t1100)</font>, BB folds. Turn: 7[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (t1900, 2 players) Hero checks, <font color="#cc0000">Button bets t600</font>, <font color="#cc0000">Hero raises all-in t890</font>, Button calls t290 <font color="aaaaaa">(pot was t3390)</font>. River: 2[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (t3680, 1 player + 1 all-in - Main pot: t3680) Results: Final pot: t3680 Button shows 9d 8c Hero shows Qc Jc and wins the pot ------------------- Party Poker No Limit Holdem Tournament Blinds: t50/t100 6 players Converter Stack sizes: UTG: t2000 UTG+1: t4020 CO: t6300 Hero: t3680 SB: t950 BB: t3050 Pre-flop: (6 players) Hero is Button with Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 2 folds, CO calls t100 <font color="aaaaaa">(pot was t150)</font>, <font color="#cc0000">Hero raises to t450</font>, SB folds, BB calls t350 <font color="aaaaaa">(pot was t700)</font>, <font color="#cc0000">CO raises to t800</font>, Hero? First time I see villain. He was ~60/15 filtered after a very small sample size, so probably no read other than that he is not a genius obv. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $22 interesting back-to-back hands against same villain
On the 1st hand I think you should fold or shove on the flop. I don't think we'll ever fold to a turn bet here, so unless you have the nuts and are trying to extract more chips from villain, there's no point in just calling the flop.
Anyway, I think I would fold here without a read, since this is a huge overbet and there's a good chance that villain has a weak ace. On the second hand, I would usually expect a monster like AA or KK with this limp/min-RR. But with this villain, who knows. I think I call here and fold to a flop bet if an A or K shows. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $22 interesting back-to-back hands against same villain
[ QUOTE ]
On the 1st hand I think you should fold or shove on the flop. I don't think we'll ever fold to a turn bet here, so unless you have the nuts and are trying to extract more chips from villain, there's no point in just calling the flop. [/ QUOTE ] But a draw isnt likely so isnt it better to keep bluffer betting? If we raise we raise out anything we beat. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $22 interesting back-to-back hands against same villain
1st hand
You see this quite allot with certain players with a big stack. They want to pick up every pot by massively overbetting it. If I had seen him do this a few times then I would play it the same way you had (I would only be afraid of villain with KQ, I think he would slowplay an ace). 2nd Hand I wouldn't feel that great about taking a flop with QQ (against big stack) - so I would probably shove here. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $22 interesting back-to-back hands against same villain
Hand #1: I like it.
Hand #2: I'm pushing over his minreraise because he's obviously an idiot and there is so much dead money in the pot. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $22 interesting back-to-back hands against same villain
1. shove flop
2. i fold just because we are deep and wont have an idea where we stand on a dry flop. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $22 interesting back-to-back hands against same villain
[ QUOTE ]
Hand #1: I like it. Hand #2: I'm pushing over his minreraise because he's obviously an idiot and there is so much dead money in the pot. [/ QUOTE ] |
|
|