#1
|
|||
|
|||
200 NL lower straight on the pair board
PokerStars Game #13075005153: Hold'em No Limit ($1/$2) - 2007/11/06 - 11:05:17 (ET)
Table 'Fornax' 6-max Seat #2 is the button Seat 1: MrteddyKGB ($410.85 in chips) Seat 2: Wats/Lanford ($380.65 in chips) Seat 4: Strz ($227.90 in chips) Seat 5: Scugalen ($200 in chips) Seat 6: redrock007 ($203.35 in chips) Strz: posts small blind $1 Scugalen: posts big blind $2 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to Wats/Lanford [2d 3d] redrock007: folds MrteddyKGB: folds Wats/Lanford: raises $6 to $8 Strz: folds Scugalen: calls $6 *** FLOP *** [6c 5d 5s] Scugalen: checks Wats/Lanford: checks *** TURN *** [6c 5d 5s] [4c] Scugalen: bets $10 Wats/Lanford: raises $30 to $40 Scugalen: raises $152 to $192 and is all-in Wats/Lanford: ??? No read on the villain. I usually C bet this flop but I mixed it up this time. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200 NL lower straight on the pair board
I think 78 prob bets flop, and ppl tend to slowplay boats on turn (obviously player dependant). I think this will be a flop-slowplayed 5 a decent amount of the time (can also include some overaggro overpairs). Pretty marginal either way, but id lean towards calling.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200 NL lower straight on the pair board
I'd call here, I think an unknown with this line is more likely to show you something like A5/77 than a boat or higher straight
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200 NL lower straight on the pair board
As I review the hand, over pair is in his range. also some suited connectors. My hand is unrepresented so call is the best???
|
|
|