#1
|
|||
|
|||
flop peel
been running insane bad, questioning everything, hating life. sorry for the dumb question.
you open on the CO with Qs 9s, unknown sb 3bets, bb folds, you call. heads up. flop is 6s 3c 2c he bets, you're getting 8 to 1. peel here or fold? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: flop peel
With backdoor flush and two overcards I definitely peel
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: flop peel
[ QUOTE ]
With backdoor flush and two overcards I definitely peel [/ QUOTE ] thank you. it's been a rough couple weeks. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: flop peel
Yeah I peel here pretty much every time.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: flop peel
I fold. You have almost zero semibluffing fold equity on the turn even if you hit a spade, no showdown value, and a non-trivial chance of being dominated by a better queen or a pocket pair above 8s.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: flop peel
[ QUOTE ]
I fold. You have almost zero semibluffing fold equity on the turn even if you hit a spade, no showdown value, and a non-trivial chance of being dominated by a better queen or a pocket pair above 8s. [/ QUOTE ] |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: flop peel
[ QUOTE ]
Yeah I peel here pretty much every time. [/ QUOTE ] oh man, this might turn into a heated debate. I'm peeling here 100%. He 3bet you preflop, there's no reason to fear the worst just yet. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: flop peel
I would peel here a lot, this is a button vs SB situation.
What is the SB structure here as I think this would change villains range significantly... We are getting 8:1 immediate odds with 4.5 outs. Surely we can make up 1 big bet of implied odds somewhere with position. True |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: flop peel
I fold, I'd peel if it was just a regular raise but a 3bet indicates a pretty good hand, making it much more likely you are up against a big pair or AQ.
I dont think it matters too much though. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: flop peel
[ QUOTE ]
I fold, I'd peel if it was just a regular raise but a 3bet indicates a pretty good hand, making it much more likely you are up against a big pair or AQ. I dont think it matters too much though. [/ QUOTE ] maybe for an MP or UTG raise. I think that SB 3-betting a CO raise is far looser than an original 3-bet. True |
|
|