|
|
#1
09-24-2007, 04:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
NL200 99 vs. shortstack
any thgoughts?? can I ever c/f the turn?
Converted at KJpoker.com Comments and ratings can be found there. Played at Prima Poker 6 players, seat 3 is the button Seat 1: UTG+1 ($305.00) Seat 2: CO ($88.40) Seat 3: BTN ($299.14) Seat 4: SB ($49.50) Seat 5: <font color="#C80000">Hero</font> ($616.50) Seat 6: UTG ($66.79) SB posts small blind, $1.50 <font color="#C80000">Hero</font> posts big blind, $3.00 Dealing to <font color="#C80000">Hero</font>: 9[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img],9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] UTG+1 folds CO raises to $6 BTN folds SB folds <font color="#C80000">Hero</font> raises to $21 CO calls Dealing flop: (Pot is $43.50) 8[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img],2[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img],Q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#C80000">Hero</font> bets $37 CO calls Dealing turn: (Pot is $117.50) 6[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#C80000">Hero</font> bets $31 CO is all-in $30.4 Dealing river: (Pot is $178.90) K[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] Showdown is hidden 
|
|
#3
09-24-2007, 04:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL200 99 vs. shortstack
I would check the turn and river with no intention of folding to any bet. I believe you have a better chance of getting you money in good by calling instead of betting. His/her calling range is going to be smaller than their betting range on the turn and river.
|
|
#5
09-24-2007, 04:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL200 99 vs. shortstack
hmm ok thx i was thinking the same however he had 88(set) this time and I was wondering if he would call me down with something like A8
|
|
#6
09-24-2007, 04:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL200 99 vs. shortstack
only other thing u coulda done since u knew it was just him and you in the hand, was reraise to like 27 preflop...that way you can just put him in on good flop and it wont be too much of an overbet
but i still like chitowns line best here
|
|
#8
09-24-2007, 05:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL200 99 vs. shortstack
[ QUOTE ]
I would check the turn and river with no intention of folding to any bet. I believe you have a better chance of getting you money in good by calling instead of betting. His/her calling range is going to be smaller than their betting range on the turn and river. [/ QUOTE ] not when there is only $30 left in a $120 pot. You just let him bet his Qs and check his 8s and aks.
|
|
#9
09-24-2007, 05:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL200 99 vs. shortstack
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I would check the turn and river with no intention of folding to any bet. I believe you have a better chance of getting you money in good by calling instead of betting. His/her calling range is going to be smaller than their betting range on the turn and river. [/ QUOTE ] not when there is only $30 left in a $120 pot. You just let him bet his Qs and check his 8s and aks. [/ QUOTE ] He is not folding the turn if you are beat. His betting range is larger than his calling range, slight but larger. Therefore check calling is better.
|
|
#10
09-24-2007, 05:24 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL200 99 vs. shortstack
[ QUOTE ]
He is not folding the turn if you are beat. His betting range is larger than his calling range, slight but larger. Therefore check calling is better. [/ QUOTE ] With stacks how they are he is calling every time on the turn. His calling range is 100% of the hands he has at this point.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
