|
|
#4
09-16-2007, 11:57 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is 40/2/3 a sustainable winning style in full ring?
[ QUOTE ]
The biggest winners at 25 and 50 NL are 50/12/3 from what I've noticed. I've never seen one lose alot unless they just suck. [/ QUOTE ] lol 
|
|
#6
09-16-2007, 12:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is 40/2/3 a sustainable winning style in full ring?
I think I could win at 50NL playing 40/2. If you play really good postflop, I think it's very possible. However, I doubt there's anyone who actually does win with those stats. If you were good enough postflop to be a winning player, you wouldn't be that bad preflop.
|
|
#7
09-16-2007, 12:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is 40/2/3 a sustainable winning style in full ring?
[ QUOTE ]
The biggest winners at 25 and 50 NL are 50/12/3 from what I've noticed. I've never seen one lose alot unless they just suck. [/ QUOTE ]filtering for ppl with over 300 hands in my db I don't have a single winner over 30%vpip.
|
|
#8
09-16-2007, 12:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is 40/2/3 a sustainable winning style in full ring?
[ QUOTE ]
its not a joke... Just because you can't comprehend it in your little nitty mind doesnt mean it doesnt happen. [/ QUOTE ] Ok dude, let's see some these big winners' PT stats.
|
|
#9
09-16-2007, 12:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is 40/2/3 a sustainable winning style in full ring?
depends what you mean by winning style. if someone with those stats beats .01/.02, would that make it a winning style? i don't see this working out at 50nl, and definitely not anything higher.
|
|
#10
09-16-2007, 12:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is 40/2/3 a sustainable winning style in full ring?
The biggest winner in both my databases is the_rye## and he runs about 50/12/2.5 and is doing 25+ptbb/100 over 2k+ hands. I don't have alot of hands at this house, but i'm sure there is another super laggy guy who wins big at the micros. I'm not saying there is alot of them, but it does happen.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
