#1
|
|||
|
|||
BB/100
Pardon my ignorance, as I am sure this topic has been broached numerous times, but I just got pokertracker and I am interested in deciphering the results.
It says that after 8.6K hands at $10 my bb/100 is 4. Is that good, bad, average, unsustainable, means I will be playing low stakes for awhile etc etc. I know this is a small smaple size and that around 200K would be a better sample, but just curious. Thanks Knightsridge |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BB/100
That is a solid winrate Knight. However, as you mentioned it is virtually meaningless after that many hands.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BB/100
[ QUOTE ]
That is a solid winrate Knight. However, as you mentioned it is virtually meaningless after that many hands. [/ QUOTE ] cheers. I agree though it is small though. Thanks for the info. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BB/100
With a little searching through our FAQ sticky I found the following:
Hourly Win-rate Threads This should help. There are many factors and too many variables to really get an accurate picture of what your win-rate really is. You can get a level of confidence, of course, that increase with your sample size. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BB/100
Consensus is that at 200NL 5pTbb is possible for a top player at the level.
4PTBB is a perfectly respectable winrate at 10NL but maybe a very good player might get 8-10. But then they'd have moved up! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BB/100
5ptbb is definitely doable at 2/4, not so sure about 3/6 though
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BB/100
i doubt a lot of people at nl 400 make 5bb 100
except like renton and gm |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BB/100
[ QUOTE ]
i doubt a lot of people at nl 400 make 5bb 100 except like renton and gm [/ QUOTE ] I dont, not sure about renton but its doable if you're good enough |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BB/100
I'm better than 95% of players with my rockin' 0/100 rate.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BB/100
oh, forgot to mention, that is in ptbb/100 NOT BB/100.
|
|
|