Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Tournament Poker > High Stakes MTT
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-12-2007, 04:34 AM
Bond18 Bond18 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Blogging, you know where.
Posts: 5,444
Default Official Review Thread, Bond18 Stars 1k FT

Did this last night and was really curious about the way i played late, which was basically really tight due to my position, having lilholdem resteal happy big stack on my left, and stacks on my right.

Also, if more people in HSMTT want one of these threads let me know, i have a big list for SSMTT but not so much here, that or just put them up yourself if you have problem uploading.

Thanks, Bond

http://www.pokerxfactor.com/HA82922/...l%20table/8550
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-12-2007, 05:47 AM
JP OSU JP OSU is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,798
Default Re: Official Review Thread, Bond18 Stars 1k FT

No river bet in hand 56?... Also it seemed like every hand except for the AK fold in hand 223 seemed very standard and boring...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-12-2007, 05:54 AM
registrar registrar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Football\'s rubbish anyway
Posts: 5,430
Default Re: Official Review Thread, Bond18 Stars 1k FT

I'm interested in whether you feel that you are too tight/predictable in level one with 150BBs. For example in hand 10, UTG raises 3x, MP calls you fold K8s in BB. I fold here with 75BBs usually but with 150BBs this is like always a call for me. Is that a leak? There seem to be a lot of hands in the first level which you fold where I would suggest that a call or even a raise is more approprriate with a deeper stack. A9s OTB to CO raise. 55 OTB after limpers (you call, I'd raise) etc. Not because each and every hand move is going to be profitable but just to show a willingness to play and develop image and reads while it's cheap. I think you're playing your default 75BB game with 150BBs.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-12-2007, 05:57 AM
JP OSU JP OSU is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,798
Default Re: Official Review Thread, Bond18 Stars 1k FT

[ QUOTE ]
I'm interested in whether you feel that you are too tight/predictable in level one with 150BBs. For example in hand 10, UTG raises 3x, MP calls you fold K8s in BB. I fold here with 75BBs usually but with 150BBs this is like always a call for me. Is that a leak? There seem to be a lot of hands in the first level which you fold where I would suggest that a call or even a raise is more approprriate with a deeper stack. A9s OTB to CO raise. 55 OTB after limpers (you call, I'd raise) etc. Not because each and every hand move is going to be profitable but just to show a willingness to play and develop image and reads while it's cheap. I think you're playing your default 75BB game with 150BBs.

[/ QUOTE ]

Some of this is valid, but I am never ever never ever ever calling w/ K8s in that spot...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-12-2007, 06:06 AM
luckychewy luckychewy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: misplaying kings
Posts: 6,104
Default Re: Official Review Thread, Bond18 Stars 1k FT

14 - i'd open.

56 - value bet the river and feel really good about it.

87 - i'd limp behind here w/ the utg limper protecting the pot a little bit.

103 - i'd just put it in pf, jj+ ak would be my range to stick it in there vs. an unknown.

114 - i usually vbet river here.

127 - good line, but if the turn is a 2d shove>c/r imo.

154 - i'd open.

205 - is this standard? i'm flatting here fairly often but it's definitely the bottom of my range as i fold 88.

209 - i like go and go'ing significantly more.

223 - i love how you played this.

275 - i'm all for iso'ing weak limpers but this seems too loose to me.

353 - seems like an okay spot to shove pf since this guy isn't playing very well.

427 - i'd open this.

457 - this seems pretty marginal to me. you have a really good image though.

469 - could maybe open this since you have a really good image.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-12-2007, 06:19 AM
grafyx grafyx is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: grey fox
Posts: 2,710
Default Re: Official Review Thread, Bond18 Stars 1k FT

211 - This looks like a fold.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-12-2007, 06:50 AM
BondGirl BondGirl is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 31
Default Re: Official Review Thread, Bond18 Stars 1k FT

This is Bond on Bondgirls comp:

14 - i'd open.

Yea that sounds good, likely a result of having a ton of tables up.

56 - value bet the river and feel really good about it.

Yea dude, where the [censored] was the value bet here? This kind of thing is the result of my having no confidence in my deep stack game, but come on this is to obvious.

87 - i'd limp behind here w/ the utg limper protecting the pot a little bit.

K, i can like that.

103 - i'd just put it in pf, jj+ ak would be my range to stick it in there vs. an unknown.

Yea, posted it, found that out.

114 - i usually vbet river here.

O rly? Because FD missed and thats a lot of what my hand looks like or do we really think theres a lot of worse hands that will be calling?

127 - good line, but if the turn is a 2d shove>c/r imo.

Yea i agree. Seemed like a good card for it.

154 - i'd open.

Ace rag with both players in the blinds having good resteal stacks?

205 - is this standard? i'm flatting here fairly often but it's definitely the bottom of my range as i fold 88.

I have no idea, i'm always calling TT, always folding 88. In later position with no risk of a squeeze i'd call more confidently.

209 - i like go and go'ing significantly more.

I was thinking about it a lot during this hand and i think your right. I coudln't decide which was better, but i think making it 4400 and jamming the majority of flops.

223 - i love how you played this.

Yea, don't think there was any other way, turned out well to.

275 - i'm all for iso'ing weak limpers but this seems too loose to me.

This was on the exact money bubble and my image was good.

353 - seems like an okay spot to shove pf since this guy isn't playing very well.

Yea i agree, his limp threw me off, i don't think he'd limped before up to that point.

427 - i'd open this.

Yea thats prolly good.

457 - this seems pretty marginal to me. you have a really good image though.

Yea, obv 100% image based, i'd been doing SO much folding.

469 - could maybe open this since you have a really good image.

Opening light at 18 BB's always feels awkward, but your right that i have a sick tight image. IDK if i like this spot so much, but man i was doing a lot of folding.


Thanks for the review Chewy.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-12-2007, 08:15 AM
luckychewy luckychewy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: misplaying kings
Posts: 6,104
Default Re: Official Review Thread, Bond18 Stars 1k FT

mainly cause fd missed in 114 yea, and cause after his turn chk u only lose to kx or qj. also not many ppl bluff the river there so if you check it should probably be with intentions to c/r or fold.

in 154 u are opening from hj and ur image is always pretty solid. stealth was sb too so it's not like he's gonna reshove random air. i'm obv folding to a 3-bet tho.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-12-2007, 08:17 AM
ASPoker8 ASPoker8 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Titletown (Boston, UF)
Posts: 13,738
Default Re: Official Review Thread, Bond18 Stars 1k FT

14 - I open too

56 - vbet river!

103 - I stick it in pf

114 - Do you always call preflop here? I always hate doing it but I feel like we have to with the smallish raise and the stacks and him raising in lp. I like how you played postflop.

127 - I play it the same except maybe make a larger flop bet.

193 - Is this always a fold here? I sort of want to shove..

205 - I think you can flat here

209 - Sort of a big shove, i'd just make a standard 3bet size (snapcall shove or stick it in on any flop)

251 - Is this standard? I'd usually fold here [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

276 - nh Bondgirl... Bond is wayyy too nitty for this [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]

353 - I shove

420 - If UTG is solid (i don't know if he is or not), isn't this sort of marginal? You have like 25BBs and are shoving over his open, meh. I shove too but its not a happy shove.

427 - I wouldn't open here.. 20bb's, raise/folding sucks and we arent LP or anything

457 - nice

460 - also nice

466 - I'm tempted to shove here if greens opening range is in any way wide
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-12-2007, 08:42 AM
theordinaryboy theordinaryboy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 243
Default Re: Official Review Thread, Bond18 Stars 1k FT

Hand 103: Was your thinking here to call pre-flop and check/call a non K or A flop? Would you have check/folded an A high flop getting 2:1? Did you not consider pushing pre-flop?

Hand 111: Why no continuation bet? The Board is not very co-ordinated.

Hand 114: Is it too thin to bet this river say half pot?

Hand 205: Annoying having to lay down 99 there, how deep do you have to be to call there?

Hand 418: Maybe raise A4o here, but big stack in small blind is a big put off.

Hand 468: No raise here?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.