luck or more luck?

[lamgabejambo]

So here's the million dollar question... We all know that you need some kind of luck in any MTT tourney. Now does it take more luck if you're playing a super aggressive style/ aggressive style/ or a fairly tight style. When you're agressive, you might run into a big hand sooner or later, and you need luck sooner. If you're a tight player and wait till you're short stack, you need luck to double up, maybe later down the tourney. Therefore, which style needs less luck to win?

[Hawklet]

tight requires more luck because you have to win showdowns

[Killingbird]

[ QUOTE ]
tight requires more luck because you have to win showdowns

[/ QUOTE ]

[nath]

[ QUOTE ]
tight requires more luck because you have to win showdowns

[/ QUOTE ]
and this is why loose is better

[Mi_T_Sharp]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
tight requires more luck because you have to win showdowns

[/ QUOTE ]
and this is why loose is better

[/ QUOTE ]

I've been playing like a nit lately. Screw that. Time to lag it up then.

[Killingbird]

and this is why Nath is better

[/ QUOTE ]

FYP

[stevepa]

[ QUOTE ]
tight requires more luck because you have to win showdowns

[/ QUOTE ]

lol....You are joking right?

[gobbomom]

stevepa for mod [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

[MJBuddy]

Tight obv means weak calling station that never bluffs.

[odellthurman]

What does lamgabejambo mean?