#1
|
|||
|
|||
Way too passive, or well played?
Party Poker 15/30
UTG limps. This is the second time I have seen him limp UTG in half an hour. The first time, he didn't reraise preflop, and showed ATo at the river. My notes from a previous day say that he is "loose, but a smart, thinking, player". His stats are 31/17/1.36. That's not a note I would write on too many people, so I am being wary. Folded to Cutoff, who limps. I raise with Q [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]J [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]. SB folds, Very LAGGY BB calls, and here comes UTG with a raise. Cutoff folds, I call, BB calls. Flop is K [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]T [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]Q [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] BB checks, UTG bets, I call, and BB calls. Turn is Q [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]. UTG bets, I call, BB raises. UTG folds, and I call. Two tough decisions there, as I really thought there was a good chance that UTG already made a full house. BB cleared that up, but left me wondering. My plan was to raise a non-club river. River is 5 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]. BB bets, I call. This hand felt VERY strange, but every time I called, I really thought it was the best decision (well, maybe not the river...that one was purely crying.). I still have no idea. Let me have it. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Way too passive, or well played?
Meh. Start raising.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Way too passive, or well played?
I'm not being critical here. Does anyone think raising 2 limpers with QJs in that spot is a particularly good or bad play in a party poker $15-30 game?
It's definitely a play in my book but not necessarily a raise. The hand itself you could have put more action in on the flop and the turn, especially on the flop. It's true you might get hammered by the UTG for 3 small bets but it puts pressure on the BB to give it up or define his hand and you have a decent flop to work with even if you are beat |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Way too passive, or well played?
[ QUOTE ]
Meh. Start raising. [/ QUOTE ] This is exactly why I posted this hand. If there is not UTG limp re-raiser, I bet and raise in every single spot up to the river here. But the limp reraise has me confused, and by that time, it's a whole different hand. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Way too passive, or well played?
Holdem Hi: 44 enumerated boards containing Kc Qc Tc Qd
cards win %win lose %lose tie %tie EV Qs Js 42 95.45 2 4.55 0 0.00 0.955 Ad Ah 2 4.55 42 95.45 0 0.00 0.045 Holdem Hi: 44 enumerated boards containing Kc Qc Tc Qd cards win %win lose %lose tie %tie EV Qs Js 1 2.27 43 97.73 0 0.00 0.023 Kd Kh 43 97.73 1 2.27 0 0.00 0.977 Holdem Hi: 44 enumerated boards containing Kc Qc Tc Qd cards win %win lose %lose tie %tie EV Qs Js 42 95.45 2 4.55 0 0.00 0.955 Ad Kd 2 4.55 42 95.45 0 0.00 0.045 And of course villian is more likely to have AA than KK since there is a K on the flop. |
|
|