Misc. Stats tab in PT

[beachbum]

I have a feeling I'm playing one pair hands pretty badly. I think it's my biggest leak. I've attached a screenshot from PokerTracker from the Misc. Stats tab, both with the results from "Show Only Hands That Were Not Folded" checked on and off. This image is from about 90k hands of NL100. It'd be nice if some others would compare it to their results to try and determine a benchmark.

[cd1680]

i have noticed this too. my stats are very similar. however, i only have about 14k hands of nl 50 and 10k hands of nl 100.

[sublime]

i have mine up but i dont know how to interpret the data really. i see that your 'amount won' is higher than mine, despite me having 15k more hands in DB. otoh my w/r is ok over that span. confusion

[beachbum]

bump, for the day crowd

[sublime]

BB-

perhaps give some of your thoughts on what these stats mean? im sure there are a few lime me who would be happy to discuss if they knew exactly what the data meant to their overall game.

[sh58]

i think it is standard to lose money with 1 pair, be worried if you lose money with any better hands.

how much money are you going to win with bottom pair for example.

example of a 1 pair hand, you have AK, you raise, BB calls, he check calls your Cbet on 773 flop, then you check it down. you have 1 pair here, but still lose about $11 if we are at NL100

[TianYuan]

Do pocket pairs that don't flop sets count in the "1 pair section"? IE, 22 rarely wins money without hitting a set, so all its profits are listed under three of a kind, and all the losses are counted under 1 pair?

[Shizzle12345]

[ QUOTE ]
Do pocket pairs that don't flop sets count in the "1 pair section"? IE, 22 rarely wins money without hitting a set, so all its profits are listed under three of a kind, and all the losses are counted under 1 pair?

[/ QUOTE ]
yep thats it, it just counts the time that your FINAL hand is one pair (wether you fold preflop or you got to show down).